§

Local 456, Teamsters

212 N.L.R.B. 968 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Local 456, Teamsters

5 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  2. Newspaper Pub. Assn. v. Labor Board

    345 U.S. 100 (1953)   Cited 31 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 53. Argued November 19, 1952. Decided March 9, 1953. A labor organization does not engage in an unfair labor practice, within the meaning of § 8(b)(6) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, when it insists that newspaper publishers pay printers for reproducing advertising matter for which the publishers ordinarily have no use. Pp. 101-111. (a) The language and legislative

  3. Labor Board v. Gamble Enterprises

    345 U.S. 117 (1953)   Cited 13 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 238. Argued November 19, 1952. Decided March 9, 1953. A labor organization does not engage in an unfair labor practice, within the meaning of § 8(b)(6) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, when it insists that the management of one of an interstate chain of theaters shall employ a local orchestra to play in connection with certain programs, although that management does

  4. American Newspaper Pub. v. N.L.R.B

    193 F.2d 782 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 38 times
    In American Newspaper, the complaint clearly described the action that was alleged to constitute the unfair labor practice.

  5. Gamble Enterprises v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    196 F.2d 61 (6th Cir. 1952)   Cited 4 times

    No. 11405. May 9, 1952. Frank C. Heath, Cleveland, Ohio, Frank C. Heath, Edward E. Rigney, and Bayless A. Manning, all of Cleveland, Ohio, on brief; Jones, Day, Cockley Reavis, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, for petitioner. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Bernard Dunau and Alice Andrews, all of Washington, D.C., on brief, for respondent. Henry Kaiser, Washington, D.C., for intervenor. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and McALLISTER, Circuit