Local 456, Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, Etc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hopwood R. Co.

    98 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 32 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Hopwood Retinning Co., 98 F.2d 97, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit based its conclusion that a company engaged in repairing milk and ice cream containers was engaged in "interstate commerce" within the meaning of the Act upon the fact that 23% of the containers on which work was to be done were transported in the company's truck from and to states other than the state where the work was performed.
  3. National Labor Rel. Board v. Salant Salant

    183 F.2d 462 (6th Cir. 1950)   Cited 3 times
    Rejecting respondent's argument that relief should be limited only to plants where violations had occurred because respondent "had instituted a system-wide and centrally directed and coordinated movement to commit unfair labor practices"
  4. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"