§

Local 445, Teamsters

194 N.L.R.B. 579 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
Local 445, Teamsters

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 542, International Union of Operating Engineers

    331 F.2d 99 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 13 times

    No. 14549. Argued January 22, 1964. Decided April 27, 1964. James C. Paras, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Lee M. Modjeska, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Abraham E. Freedman, Philadelphia, Pa. (Martin J. Vigderman, Freedman, Landy Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and FORMAN and GANEY, Circuit

  3. National Labor Relations B. v. Local U. N. 141

    425 F.2d 730 (6th Cir. 1970)   Cited 4 times

    No. 19830. May 5, 1970. Roger L. Sabo, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, John I. Taylor, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Robert I. Doggett, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent; Smith, Latimer, Doggett Swing, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief. Bauer Morelli, Arnold Morelli, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief for intervenor. Before PECK, COMBS, and BROOKS, Circuit Judges.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Muskegon Bricklayers Union No. 5

    378 F.2d 859 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 6 times

    No. 16886. June 15, 1967. Gary Green, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Martin R. Ganzglass, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Jerry S. McCroskey, Muskegon, Mich., Marcus, McCroskey, Libner, Reamon, Williams Dilley, Darryl R. Cochrane, Muskegon, Mich., on brief, for respondent. Before EDWARDS, CELEBREZZE and PECK, Circuit Judges. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge. The National

  5. Barker Brothers Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 431 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 5 times
    In Barker Bros., the Board held that no such effect had occurred where "there were only 3 delivery stoppages, 2 work delays, and several delivery delays" and where, in addition, "the record (was) virtually silent as to not only the nature and quantity of the products that failed to reach their destination, but also the impact of the stoppage and/or delays on the Employer's business."