Local 417, UAW

10 Cited authorities

  1. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,209 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America

    391 U.S. 418 (1968)   Cited 215 times
    Holding that union could not expel member because he filed unfair labor practice charge against it without first exhausting internal remedies as provided in union constitution
  3. Ruzicka v. General Motors Corporation

    523 F.2d 306 (6th Cir. 1975)   Cited 115 times
    Finding inexplicable delay in pursuing grievances to be a breach of the DFR and stating, โ€œThe requirement of exhaustion of intra-Union remedies is bottomed on the hope that such procedures will quickly resolve disputes without the delay inherent in the judicial process and with the aid of persons experienced at resolving member-union conflicts short of a full-blown judicial proceeding. When that hope has failed, however, the member is not barred from proceeding to federal court with a claim of unfair representation.โ€
  4. Baldini v. Local Union No. 1095

    581 F.2d 145 (7th Cir. 1978)   Cited 54 times
    In Baldini, the record permitted inferences that the union's failure to proceed to arbitration was motivated by malice or discrimination or by bad faith.
  5. Milstead v. International Bro. of Teamsters

    580 F.2d 232 (6th Cir. 1978)   Cited 43 times
    Finding that bad faith is not a "necessary element of proof when alleging arbitrary or discriminatory conduct"
  6. Philip Carey Mfg., v. N.L.R.B

    331 F.2d 720 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 42 times

    Nos. 15289, 15330. March 31, 1964. J. Mack Swigert, Cincinnati, Ohio, Frank H. Stewart, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief; E.J. Fasold, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel, for Philip Carey Mfg. Co. Lowell Goerlich, Washington, D.C., for International Union, etc. William J. Avrutis, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for N.L.R.B. Before

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 485, International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers

    454 F.2d 17 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 15 times
    Denying enforcement of Board order awarding backpay against union for breach of duty because grievance not shown to have merit
  8. Intnl. U., Ele., R. M. Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    307 F.2d 679 (D.C. Cir. 1962)   Cited 24 times

    Nos. 16273 and 16301. Argued January 4, 1962. Decided June 7, 1962. Petition for Rehearing Denied in No. 16,273 July 5, 1962. Certiorari Denied December 10, 1962. See 83 S.Ct. 307. Mr. David S. Davidson, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Benjamin C. Sigal, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 16273. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General

  9. United States v. Adamo Wrecking Co.

    545 F.2d 1 (6th Cir. 1976)   Cited 4 times

    No. 75-1967. Argued June 15, 1976. Decided November 1, 1976. Philip VanDam, U.S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., John J. Zimmerman, Edmund B. Clark, Jacques B. Gelin, Peter R. Taft, Land Natural Resources Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant. John E. Scott, Wiley Y. Daniel, Dickinson, Wright, McKean, Cudlip Moon, Detroit, Mich., Burton Y. Weitzenfeld, Stanley M. Lipnick, Arthur L. Klein, Arnstein, Gluck, Weitzenfeld Minow, Chicago, Ill., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Marbro Food Service, Inc.

    366 F.2d 477 (10th Cir. 1966)   Cited 4 times

    No. 8572. September 15, 1966. Thomas Canafax, Attorney, N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and George B. Driesen, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Russell P. Kramer, Denver, Colo. (Richard L. Harring, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN and SETH, Circuit Judges. BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge. Pursuant to ยง 10(e) of the National