§

Local 38, Electrical Wkrs.

191 N.L.R.B. 558 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
Local 38, Electrical Wkrs.

7 Cited authorities

  1. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

  2. Labor Board v. Servette

    377 U.S. 46 (1964)   Cited 74 times
    Holding under section 8(b) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b), that statutory protection for the distribution of handbills would be undermined if a threat to engage in protected conduct were not itself protected

  3. N.L.R.B. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

    332 F.2d 992 (4th Cir. 1964)   Cited 21 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. International Longshoremen's Assoc., 332 F.2d 992 (4th Cir. 1964) the court refused to enforce a cease and desist order of the NLRB because it found no labor dispute had been presented over which the NLRB had jurisdiction.

  4. Local U. No. 636 v. N.L.R.B

    430 F.2d 906 (D.C. Cir. 1970)   Cited 13 times

    No. 23342. Argued June 12, 1970. Decided July 29, 1970. Mr. Patrick C. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Martin F. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Ian D. Lanoff, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Illinois, pro hac vice by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wine, Liquor, U

    178 F.2d 584 (2d Cir. 1949)   Cited 24 times

    No. 29, Docket 2137-1. Argued November 7, 1949. Decided December 12, 1949. Robert N. Denham, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Reeves R. Hilton, Dominick L. Manoli and Albert Dreyer, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board, Reeves R. Hilton, Washington, D.C., counsel. Cohen Burlakoff, New York City, Arnold Cohen, New York City, for respondent, Joseph E. Brill and Harold Krieger, New York City, on the brief. Before

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Washington-Oregon

    211 F.2d 149 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 17 times

    No. 13768. March 8, 1954. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Bernard Dunau, James A. Ryan, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Wettrick, Flood O'Brien, George E. Flood, George O. Toulouse, Jr., Seattle, Wash., Francis X. Ward, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges. DENMAN, Chief Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the

  7. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"