§

Local 340, Potters

175 N.L.R.B. 756 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Local 340, Potters

7 Cited authorities

  1. Macomb Pottery Company v. N.L.R.B

    376 F.2d 450 (7th Cir. 1967)   Cited 26 times

    No. 15675. April 18, 1967. Richard L. Marcus, R. Theodore Clark, Jr., Chicago, Ill., Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather Geraldson, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioners. Joseph E. Finley, Melvin S. Schwarzwald, Cleveland, Ohio, Metzenbaum, Gaines, Schwartz, Krupansky, Finley Stern, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, for intervenor. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Malcolm David Schultz, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen,

  2. Intnl. U., Ele., R. M. Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    307 F.2d 679 (D.C. Cir. 1962)   Cited 24 times

    Nos. 16273 and 16301. Argued January 4, 1962. Decided June 7, 1962. Petition for Rehearing Denied in No. 16,273 July 5, 1962. Certiorari Denied December 10, 1962. See 83 S.Ct. 307. Mr. David S. Davidson, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Benjamin C. Sigal, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 16273. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Hotel, Motel Club Empl. U

    320 F.2d 254 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 17 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's finding of § 8(b) and § 8(b) violations for improper securing of employee's discharge, with no discussion of how union's conduct constitutes restraint of employee "in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7" under § 8(b)

  4. N.L.R.B. v. L. 182, Int'l Bro. of Teamsters

    401 F.2d 509 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 73, 74, Dockets 32267, 32268. Argued September 19, 1968. Decided October 3, 1968. Certiorari Denied March 10, 1969. See 89 S.Ct. 1010. John E. Nevins, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, John D. Burgoyne, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. George Schiro, Utica, N.Y., on the brief, for respondent. Before MOORE, FRIENDLY and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges. FEINBERG, Circuit Judge: The National

  5. United Nuclear Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    340 F.2d 133 (1st Cir. 1965)   Cited 6 times
    In United Nuclear, the court found that fifty employees, who did not fulfill all requirements of membership including approval by a majority of the members, formal initiation, and subscription to an oath, "could not become members by estoppel," even though they all paid initiation fees and dues and some attended union meetings and voted.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft, Agricultural Implement Workers

    297 F.2d 272 (1st Cir. 1961)   Cited 8 times

    No. 5828. Heard October 2, 1961. Decided December 27, 1961. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Harold B. Roitman, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The petitioner, the National

  7. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"