Local 324, International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE), AFL-CIO (The Selinsky Force, LLC)

13 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,693 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 335 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America

    391 U.S. 418 (1968)   Cited 215 times
    Holding that union could not expel member because he filed unfair labor practice charge against it without first exhausting internal remedies as provided in union constitution
  4. Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    394 U.S. 423 (1969)   Cited 117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"
  5. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Boeing Co.

    412 U.S. 67 (1973)   Cited 49 times
    Upholding position that Board lacked power to review reasonableness of union disciplinary rule imposed on members who crossed picket line
  7. Cieklinski v. National Labor Relations

    224 F. App'x 727 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 1 times

    No. 05-75079. Submitted March 12, 2007. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2). Filed March 16, 2007. Michael Cieklinski, Henderson, NV, pro se. Regional Director, National Labor Relations Board, Phoenix, AZ, Aileen A. Armstrong, Esq., Fred B. Jacob, Gregory Lauro, Esq., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. NLRB Nos. 28-CB-6013

  8. Jacoby v. N.L.R.B

    233 F.3d 611 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 5 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Jacoby, the D.C. Circuit reiterated the reasoning it articulated in Plumbers Pipe Fitters in holding that the duty of fair representation also precludes departures from established exclusive hiring hall procedures and that the Board had articulated an erroneous view of the law in concluding that the duty of fair representation did not apply when such departures were caused by union negligence. 233 F.3d at 616-17.
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Int. Broth. of Elec. Workers

    668 F.2d 991 (8th Cir. 1982)   Cited 4 times

    No. 81-1491. Submitted November 12, 1981. Decided January 21, 1982. Richard Michael Fischl, William R. Stewart, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, David R. Marshall, Atty., William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Benjamin J. Francka, Springfield, Mo., for International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Local 453. Appeal from the National Labor

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Iron Workers Union, Local 433

    767 F.2d 1438 (9th Cir. 1985)

    No. 84-7823. Argued and Submitted June 14, 1985. August 9, 1985. Elliott Moore, Howard Perlstein, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. David A. Rosenfeld, Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg Roger, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before BROWNING, ANDERSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges. NELSON, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board ("the Board") seeks enforcement of its order issued against the Iron Workers Union, Local