Local 3, Intl. Brotherhood of Electrical Wkrs.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
  2. International Union

    459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”
  3. Plumbers' Union v. Door County

    359 U.S. 354 (1959)   Cited 37 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. No. 396. Argued March 26, 1959. Decided May 4, 1959. A county, a general contractor and a plumbing contractor sued in a State Court to enjoin picketing by a plumbers' union, because of the employment of nonunion plumbers, which had stopped work on an addition to the county courthouse, about half of the total cost of which was the cost of materials brought from outside the State. Held: The controversy was exclusively within the jurisdiction of the National

  4. Marriott Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    491 F.2d 367 (9th Cir. 1974)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 72-1990, 72-2129, 72-2207. January 9, 1974. Rehearing Denied February 7, 1974. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Allison W. Brown, Jr. (argued), Washington, D.C., Abraham Siegel, Director, Region 31, NLRB, Los Angeles, Cal., for NLRB. David A. Maddux, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter Hampton, Los Angeles, Cal., A. D. Gallay (argued), Fellner Rovins, New York City, for Lufthansa. Robert M. Simpson, Rose, Klein Marias, Los Angeles, Cal., Plato E. Papps, Washington, D.C., for IAM. Charles

  5. Northeastern Ind. Bldg. Const. v. N.L.R.B

    352 F.2d 696 (D.C. Cir. 1965)   Cited 13 times

    No. 19164. Argued June 11, 1965. Decided July 28, 1965. Mr. Bernard M. Mamet, Chicago, Ill., with whom Mr. James F. Carroll, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Mrs. Linda R. Sher, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Before DANAHER, BURGER and McGOWAN, Circuit Judges. McGOWAN, Circuit Judge: