§

Local 295, Teamsters

178 N.L.R.B. 52 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Local 295, Teamsters

5 Cited authorities

  1. Tinnerman Prod. v. George K. Garrett Co.

    368 U.S. 833 (1961)   Cited 43 times

    No. 259. October 9, 1961. C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Albert R. Teare for petitioner. Reported below: 292 F. 2d 137.

  2. Wellington Mill, W. Point Mfg. v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 579 (4th Cir. 1964)   Cited 49 times
    Stating that General Counsel's "refusal to [issue a complaint] is final and unappealable"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Local 239

    289 F.2d 41 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 10 times

    No. 271, Docket 26600. Argued February 24, 1961. Decided April 17, 1961. James C. Paras, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Charles R. Katz, Katz Wolchok, New York City, for respondent. Before HINCKS and MOORE, Circuit Judges, and BRENNAN, District Judge. Sitting by designation

  4. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Piqua M. W. Prod

    109 F.2d 552 (6th Cir. 1940)   Cited 28 times
    In N. L. R. B. v. Piqua Munising Wood Products Co., 109 F.2d 552, 557, the United States Circuit Court said: "All that is requisite in a valid complaint before the Board is that there be a plain statement of the things claimed to constitute an unfair labor practice that respondent may be put upon his defense."

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Natl. Seal Corp.

    127 F.2d 776 (2d Cir. 1942)   Cited 19 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. National Seal Corp., 2 Cir., 127 F.2d 776, 779, Judge Learned Hand very definitely interpreted a rule having to do with union membership.