§

Local 294, Teamsters

193 N.L.R.B. 920 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
Local 294, Teamsters

14 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Brown

    380 U.S. 278 (1965)   Cited 473 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America

    391 U.S. 418 (1968)   Cited 215 times
    Holding that union could not expel member because he filed unfair labor practice charge against it without first exhausting internal remedies as provided in union constitution

  3. Boilermakers v. Hardeman

    401 U.S. 233 (1971)   Cited 184 times
    Holding that secion 412 of the LMRDA explicitly vests district courts with jurisdiction over LMRDA claims

  4. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

  5. Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    394 U.S. 423 (1969)   Cited 117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"

  6. Smith Steel Workers v. A.O. Smith Corporation

    420 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 34 times
    In Smith Steel Workers v. A. O. Smith Corp., 420 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1969), the union sought review of a unit classification order of the NLRB and also sought to compel arbitration provided for in the existing collective bargaining agreement with A.O. Smith. This circuit ruled that the district court was correct in dismissing the union's complaint based upon Carey.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Pembeck Oil Corp.

    404 F.2d 105 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 16 times
    In Pembeck, decided after Better Val-U Stores, Judge Hays again dissented, pointing out that neither Flomatic nor Val-U Stores had reached to § 8(a)(5) cases and urging that the "flagrant violation" standard not be extended to such cases.

  8. Carroll v. Associated Musicians of Greater N.Y.

    235 F. Supp. 161 (S.D.N.Y. 1963)   Cited 13 times

    January 15, 1963. Godfrey P. Schmidt, New York City, for plaintiff. Ashe Rifkin, New York City, for defendant Associated Musicians of Greater New York, Local 802, Eugene Victor, New York City, of counsel. McGoldrick, Dannett, Horowitz Golub, New York City, for defendant American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada, Emanuel Dannett, New York City, Jerome H. Adler, Herbert D. Schwartzman and Eugene Mittelman, New York City, of counsel. LEVET, District Judge. This action, the fifth

  9. Parks v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Wkrs.

    203 F. Supp. 288 (D. Md. 1962)   Cited 12 times
    Looking to four-month requirement of LMRDA § 101 as "authoritative expression of Congressional labor policy" and "prime source" for formulating federal law for exhaustion

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Un., Operating

    420 F.2d 961 (3d Cir. 1970)   Cited 3 times

    No. 17859. Argued January 6, 1970. Decided January 28, 1970. Corinna Lothar Metcalf, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Earl S. Aronson, Newark, N.J. (Thomas E. Durkin, Jr., Newark, N.J., on the brief), for respondent. Before BIGGS, ALDISERT and STAHL, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations

  11. Section 411 - Bill of rights; constitution and bylaws of labor organizations

    29 U.S.C. § 411   Cited 1,747 times
    Providing that exhausting a union's contractual remedies is a prerequisite to filing a civil action

  12. Section 401 - Congressional declaration of findings, purposes, and policy

    29 U.S.C. § 401   Cited 1,042 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the LMRDA was essential to "afford necessary protection of the rights and interests of employees and the public generally as they relate to the activities of labor organizations . . ."

  13. Section 501 - Fiduciary responsibility of officers of labor organizations

    29 U.S.C. § 501   Cited 816 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Declaring duties of union officials and agents to “hold [the union's] money and property solely for the benefit of the organization and its members”

  14. Section 481 - Terms of office and election procedures

    29 U.S.C. § 481   Cited 601 times
    Characterizing the right for elections to "be conducted in accordance with the constitution and bylaws of such organization" as a right under Title IV, to be enforced by the Secretary of Labor