§

Local 294, Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters

121 N.L.R.B. 924 (N.L.R.B. 1958)
Local 294, Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board

    357 U.S. 93 (1958)   Cited 201 times
    Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act

  3. Rabouin v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    195 F.2d 906 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 75 times
    In Rabouin v. N.L.R.B., 195 F.2d 906 (2nd Cir., 1962), Justice Clark, then a Circuit Judge, specifically held that a union's demand for damages equal in amount to the wages paid a non-union driver was not an attempted exaction in violation of § 8(b)(6).

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America

    241 F.2d 147 (9th Cir. 1957)   Cited 17 times

    No. 15026. February 12, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., and Norton J. Come, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Arthur Garrett and James M. Nicoson, Los Angeles, Cal., for Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters Joiners, etc., et al. Before HEALY, LEMMON, and FEE, Circuit Judges. LEMMON, Circuit Judge. While the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., hereinafter referred to as the Act

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wine, Liquor, U

    178 F.2d 584 (2d Cir. 1949)   Cited 24 times

    No. 29, Docket 2137-1. Argued November 7, 1949. Decided December 12, 1949. Robert N. Denham, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Reeves R. Hilton, Dominick L. Manoli and Albert Dreyer, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board, Reeves R. Hilton, Washington, D.C., counsel. Cohen Burlakoff, New York City, Arnold Cohen, New York City, for respondent, Joseph E. Brill and Harold Krieger, New York City, on the brief. Before

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Washington-Oregon

    211 F.2d 149 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 17 times

    No. 13768. March 8, 1954. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Bernard Dunau, James A. Ryan, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Wettrick, Flood O'Brien, George E. Flood, George O. Toulouse, Jr., Seattle, Wash., Francis X. Ward, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges. DENMAN, Chief Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the