§

Local 282, Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, Etc.

139 N.L.R.B. 1077 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
Local 282, Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, Etc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Teamsters Union v. Oliver

    358 U.S. 283 (1959)   Cited 166 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Teamsters v. Oliver, 358 U.S. 283 (1959), we held that a state antitrust law could not be used to challenge an employer-union agreement. Justice White's opinion in Jewel Tea explains, however, that Oliver held only that "[a]s the agreement did not embody a `"remote and indirect approach to the subject of wages'... but a direct frontal attack upon a problem thought to threaten the maintenance of the basic wage structure established by the collective bargaining contract,' [358 U.S.], at 294, the paramount federal policy of encouraging collective bargaining proscribed application of the state law.

  3. Retail Clerks Union Local 770 v. N.L.R.B

    296 F.2d 368 (D.C. Cir. 1961)   Cited 26 times

    No. 15862. Argued March 2, 1961. Decided July 6, 1961. Petition for Rehearing Denied August 23, 1961. Mr. Tim L. Bornstein, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. S.G. Lippman, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Melvin J. Welles, Washington, D.C., of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Mr. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal, Soft Drink & Distillery Workers of America

    272 F.2d 817 (10th Cir. 1959)   Cited 10 times

    No. 6081. November 19, 1959. Duane B. Beeson, Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Thomas J. McDermott, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and James C. Paras, Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for petitioner. James C. Paradise, Cincinnati, Ohio (Philip Hornbein, Jr., Denver, Colo., was with him on the brief), for respondents. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Chief Judge. In this action under Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended 29