§

Local 275, Laborers International Union

209 N.L.R.B. 279 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Local 275, Laborers International Union

6 Cited authorities

  1. Danielson v. L. 275, Laborers Int. U. of N.A.

    479 F.2d 1033 (2d Cir. 1973)   Cited 105 times
    Holding that irreparable injury exists even if picketing does not shut down operation, but only delays performance, resulting in lost profits, because damage attributable specifically to union activity is difficult to measure

  2. Centralia Bldg. Const. Trades v. N.L.R.B

    363 F.2d 699 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 18 times
    In Centralia, moreover, the court emphasized that the employer "would have been required to throw open its records as to such payments that monthly inspection might be made" by the picketing union.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Suffolk County District Council of Carpenters

    387 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 36, 37, Docket 31151, 31152. Argued September 21, 1967. Decided December 13, 1967. Lawrence J. Sherman, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Ernest Fleischman, New York City (Delson Gordon, Stephen F. Gordon, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before WATERMAN, MOORE and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges. FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

    339 F.2d 600 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 8 times

    No. 213, Docket 27851. Argued October 23, 1964. Decided December 18, 1964. Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Robert G. Sewell, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Harold Stern, New York City (Norman Rothfeld, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before FRIENDLY, KAUFMAN and ANDERSON

  5. Danielson v. Local 323, United Bro. of Carpenters Join.

    357 F. Supp. 1178 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)   Cited 1 times

    No. 73 Civ. 425. March 16, 1973. Sidney Danielson, Regional Director Region 2 by Bertram T. Kupsinel, N.L.R.B., New York City, for petitioner. Richard N. Cudrin, Jackson, Lewis, Schnitzler Krupman, New York City, for charging party. Ralph P. Katz, Delson Gordon, New York City, for respondents Laborers Local 275, Masons Local 55 and Painters Dist. Council No. 20. Patrick Campbell, New City, N.Y., for respondent Local 323. PIERCE, District Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case came on to be heard upon

  6. Barker Brothers Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 431 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 5 times
    In Barker Bros., the Board held that no such effect had occurred where "there were only 3 delivery stoppages, 2 work delays, and several delivery delays" and where, in addition, "the record (was) virtually silent as to not only the nature and quantity of the products that failed to reach their destination, but also the impact of the stoppage and/or delays on the Employer's business."