Local 271, Int'l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

7 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Johnson

    322 F.2d 216 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 23 times

    No. 15031. September 4, 1963. Solomon I. Hirsh, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert Sewell, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. Thomas S. Calder, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent, Jack G. Evans, Thomas S. Calder, Dinsmore, Shohl, Barrett, Coates Deupree, Cincinnati, Ohio, Robert W. Newlon, Warren C. Armstrong, Columbus, Ohio, on the brief. Before WEICK, Circuit

  2. N.L.R.B. v. H.E. Fletcher Co.

    298 F.2d 594 (1st Cir. 1962)   Cited 24 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. H.E. Fletcher Company, 298 F.2d 594 (C.A. 1) 1962, there was no mention of the found violation in the complaint.
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Puerto Rico Rayon Mills, Inc.

    293 F.2d 941 (1st Cir. 1961)   Cited 22 times
    Enforcing an order based on a theory of violation not alleged but fully litigated
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford Radio & Mica Corp.

    258 F.2d 457 (2d Cir. 1958)   Cited 18 times
    Noting that when motivation of employer in taking certain action is at issue, "[the General Counsel's] refusal to elicit th[e] readily available and crucial testimony of a disinterested witness may well be taken to mean that the information was adverse to his case."
  5. N.L.R.B. v. E B Brewing Company

    276 F.2d 594 (6th Cir. 1960)   Cited 16 times
    In NLRB v. E B Brewing Co., 276 F.2d 594, 600 (6th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 908, 81 S.Ct. 1083, 6 L.Ed.2d 234 (1961), our court held that retroactive application of a change of policy should not occur where it will "work hardship upon a party altogether out of proportion to the public ends to be accomplished," citing NLRB v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 195 F.2d 141 (9th Cir. 1952).
  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. I.B.S. Mfg. Co.

    210 F.2d 634 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 15 times

    No. 14545. February 23, 1954. Rehearing Denied March 26, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., George J. Bott, General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Louis Schwartz, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Leslie Darden, New Albany, Miss., Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., G. Maynard Smith (of Wilson, Branch Smith), Atlanta, Ga., Fred B. Smith, Ripley, Miss., for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Texas Natural

    253 F.2d 322 (5th Cir. 1958)   Cited 4 times

    No. 16665. March 18, 1958. Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., William J. Avrutis, Atty., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. C.A. Kothe, W.H. Eyssen, Jr., Tulsa, Okla., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges. JONES, Circuit Judge. Since so much in this case is dependent upon the factual situation, it becomes necessary to relate the chain of events in some detail. The respondent, Texas