Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
ยง

Local 205, Lithographers and Photoengravers

186 N.L.R.B. 454 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
Local 205, Lithographers and Photoengravers

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 335 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

  2. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 325 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  3. Machinists v. Gonzales

    356 U.S. 617 (1958)   Cited 256 times
    Holding that state contract claim was not preempted because it was internal to the union and not subject to regulation under the NLRA

  4. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  5. Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    394 U.S. 423 (1969)   Cited 117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"

  6. Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union

    362 U.S. 274 (1960)   Cited 109 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Drivers Local 639, 362 U.S. 274 (1960), the Court held that ยง 8(b)(1)(A) was "a grant of power to the Board limited to authority to proceed against union tactics involving violence, intimidation, and reprisal or threats thereof."

  7. Scofield v. N.L.R.B

    393 F.2d 49 (7th Cir. 1968)   Cited 5 times

    No. 14698. March 5, 1968. James Urdan, John Q. Kamps, Quarles, Herriott Clemons, Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioners. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., John Silard, Harriett R. Taylor, Stephen I. Schlossberg, Washington, D.C., Harold A. Katz, Irving M. Friedman, Chicago, Ill., Philip L. Padden, Milwaukee, Wis., for amicus curiae. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Atty