Local 176, United Brotherhood of Carpenters, etc.

18 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
  2. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 315 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA
  3. Anderson v. Shipowners Assn

    272 U.S. 359 (1926)   Cited 77 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a multi-employer agreement among ship owners restrained trade in a labor market for sailors
  4. Kansas City Steel Co. v. Arkansas

    269 U.S. 148 (1925)   Cited 41 times

    ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 54. Submitted October 15, 1925. Decided November 16, 1925. 1. As to what constitutes doing business in a State within the meaning of its laws imposing preliminary conditions on foreign corporations, this Court accepts the decision of the state Supreme Court. P. 150. 2. But the questions whether a foreign corporation's business was interstate and whether the local enactments as applied were therefore repugnant to the Commerce Clause, will be

  5. Agwilines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    87 F.2d 146 (5th Cir. 1936)   Cited 74 times
    In Agwilines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 87 F.2d 146, 147, and in Waterman S.S. Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 119 F.2d 760, a contempt proceeding involving the ascertainment of back payments necessary to make employees whole, we dealt with the purpose and effect of the "make whole" provisions of the statute.
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Leland-Gifford Co.

    200 F.2d 620 (1st Cir. 1952)   Cited 23 times

    No. 4654. December 22, 1952. Maurice Alexandre, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associated Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, all of Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Ernest L. Anderson, Worcester, Mass., for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. WOODBURY, Circuit Judge. The principal issue presented by this petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor

  7. National Labor Rel. v. Broderick Wood

    261 F.2d 548 (10th Cir. 1958)   Cited 16 times
    In NLRB v. Broderick Wood Prod. Co., 10 Cir., 261 F.2d 548, 556, it was said: "Here, the union-security clause was the very basis for the charge of unfair labor practices. It was the union-security clause that Teamsters were enforcing when demanding that the employees be discharged.
  8. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. L. 404, ETC

    205 F.2d 99 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 16 times

    No. 4719. June 10, 1953. Samuel M. Singer, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and James A. Ryan, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Raymond T. King, Springfield, Mass. (Ely, King, Kingsbury Lyman, Springfield, Mass., on brief), for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. MAGRUDER, Chief Judge. Brown Equipment Manufacturing Co., Inc. — hereinafter called

  9. Del E. Webb Const. Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    196 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1952)   Cited 17 times

    Nos. 14428, 14446. May 6, 1952. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Mark C. Curran, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Charles B. Blackmar, Kansas City, Mo. (Henry I. Eager, and Blackmar, Newkirk, Eager, Swanson Midgley, all of Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for Del E. Webb Const. Co. John J. Manning, Kansas City, Mo. (Clif. Langsdale

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Shedd-Brown MFG

    213 F.2d 163 (7th Cir. 1954)   Cited 14 times

    No. 11031. May 17, 1954. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing June 17, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Clarence A. Meter, Arnold Ordman, Duane Beeson, and Mary E. Williamson, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Donald O. Wright, Minneapolis, Minn., for respondent. Before DUFFY, SWAIM and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"