Local 1426, Longshoremen

9 Cited authorities

National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
386 U.S. 612 (1967) Cited 392 times
Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"
Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.
373 U.S. 221 (1963) Cited 358 times 1 Legal Analyses
Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"
Electrical Workers v. Labor Board
366 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 186 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers
400 U.S. 297 (1971) Cited 73 times
Holding that Section 8(b)(B) applied to coercive conduct directed toward secondary employer even where union primarily demanded that employers reassign work
Labor Board v. Rice Milling Co.
341 U.S. 665 (1951) Cited 126 times
Noting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"
Detroit Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. N.L.R.B
372 F.2d 569 (6th Cir. 1967) Cited 21 times
In Detroit Newspaper Publishers Association v. NLRB, 372 F.2d 569 (6th Cir. 1967), the sole issue was not a union's disclaimer of any further representation of its members, but rather whether "two labor unions had the right to withdraw unilaterally from [a] multi-employer bargaining unit."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pecheur Lozenge Co.
209 F.2d 393 (2d Cir. 1953) Cited 27 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Pecheur Lozenge Co., 2 Cir., 209 F.2d 393, 403, 404, it was held an unfair labor practice to insist that a strike be called off as a condition of bargaining.
System Council T-4 v. N.L.R.B
446 F.2d 815 (7th Cir. 1971) Cited 5 times
No. 18161. July 19, 1971. Rehearing Denied August 11, 1971. Robert E. Fitzgerald, Jr., Chicago, Ill., Anna R. Lavin, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Gordon W. Winks, Henry E. Seyfarth, Chicago, Ill. (Intervenor), Rody P. Biggert, Edward W. Bergmann, Daniel L. Hebert, Chicago, Ill., Attys. for Illinois Bell Telephone Co.; Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather Geraldson, Chicago, Ill., of counsel. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jack Weiner, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel
Local 134, Int. Bro., Elec. Wkr. v. N.L.R.B
433 F.2d 302 (7th Cir. 1970)
No. 18095. October 23, 1970. Rehearing Denied November 16, 1970. Robert E. Fitzgerald, Jr., Anna R. Lavin, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners. Gordon W. Winks, Rody P. Biggert, Edward W. Bergmann, Chicago, Ill., for Illinois Bell Telephone Co., Intervenor; Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather Geraldson, Chicago, Ill., of counsel. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., William Avrutis, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington

Local 1426, Longshoremen

9 Cited authorities

Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

Holding that Section 8(b)(B) applied to coercive conduct directed toward secondary employer even where union primarily demanded that employers reassign work

Noting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"

In Detroit Newspaper Publishers Association v. NLRB, 372 F.2d 569 (6th Cir. 1967), the sole issue was not a union's disclaimer of any further representation of its members, but rather whether "two labor unions had the right to withdraw unilaterally from [a] multi-employer bargaining unit."

In N.L.R.B. v. Pecheur Lozenge Co., 2 Cir., 209 F.2d 393, 403, 404, it was held an unfair labor practice to insist that a strike be called off as a condition of bargaining.