§

Local 1384, Automobile Workers

227 N.L.R.B. 1045 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Local 1384, Automobile Workers

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 334 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

  2. Labor Board v. General Motors

    373 U.S. 734 (1963)   Cited 190 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause

  3. Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    394 U.S. 423 (1969)   Cited 117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Granite State Joint Board, Textile Workers Union of America, Local 1029

    409 U.S. 213 (1972)   Cited 53 times
    In NLRB v. Textile Workers, supra, and Machinists v. NLRB, 412 U.S. 84 (1973) (per curiam), the Court found as a corollary that unions may not fine former members who have resigned lawfully.

  5. Booster Lodge No. 405, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    412 U.S. 84 (1973)   Cited 35 times
    Holding the court of appeals may not properly overrule a decision of the Supreme Court in order to force its reconsideration

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Hershey Foods Corporation

    513 F.2d 1083 (9th Cir. 1975)   Cited 21 times

    No. 74-2114. April 15, 1975. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Joseph E. Mayer, Atty., William R. Stewart, Atty. (argued), Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Duane B. Beeson, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for respondent. George J. Tichy, II, San Francisco, for intervenor. Before CARTER, WRIGHT and WALLACE, Circuit Judges. OPINION WALLACE, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board brought this action to enforce its orders against Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen Helpers Union

  7. Union Starch Ref. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    186 F.2d 1008 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 51 times
    In Union Starch, the employees had tendered dues and an initiation fee but were denied membership in the union for refusal to file union application forms, attend a union meeting or take the union oath.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Granite S. J. B., T. W.U.

    446 F.2d 369 (1st Cir. 1971)   Cited 12 times

    No. 71-1063. June 29, 1971. Warren M. Davison, Deputy Asst. General Counsel, with whom Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Marvin Roth, Attorney, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Harold B. Roitman, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, and McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. McENTEE, Circuit Judge. This case comes to us on application for enforcement of a Labor Board

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Hotel, Motel Club Empl. U

    320 F.2d 254 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 17 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's finding of § 8(b) and § 8(b) violations for improper securing of employee's discharge, with no discussion of how union's conduct constitutes restraint of employee "in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7" under § 8(b)

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Mechanical Allied Prod. Wkrs. U

    427 F.2d 883 (1st Cir. 1970)   Cited 9 times

    No. 7489. June 11, 1970. Warren M. Davison, Washington, D.C., Attorney, with whom Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, were on brief, for petitioner. Harold B. Roitman, Boston, Mass., with whom Irving Rich, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. McENTEE, Circuit Judge. This is a petition for enforcement of a Labor Board order issued