Local 1367, Int.l Longshoremen's Association

9 Cited authorities

Steele v. L. N.R. Co.
323 U.S. 192 (1944) Cited 959 times
Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 470 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Tunstall v. Brotherhood
323 U.S. 210 (1944) Cited 286 times
In Tunstall v. Brotherhood, 323 U.S. 210, the federal right was derived from the federal duty of the union to act as bargaining representative for all members of the union.
Teamsters Local v. Labor Board
365 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 174 times
Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board
323 U.S. 248 (1944) Cited 162 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice
N.L.R.B. v. Miranda Fuel Co., Inc.
326 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1963) Cited 98 times
No. 73, Docket 26232. Argued October 21, 1963. Decided December 11, 1963. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Herman M. Levy, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel J. Cohen, New York City (Jack Last and Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Union. Ruth
Hughes Tool Co. v. National Labor Relations Bd.
147 F.2d 69 (5th Cir. 1945) Cited 60 times
In Hughes Tool Co. v. NLRB, 147 F.2d 69 (5th Cir. 1945), the court dealt with a prior version of § 9(a) which did not expressly guarantee the Union's right to be present at the adjustment of grievances. Nevertheless, the court found that such a right existed, and stated that it could be waived.
Central of Georgia Railway Company v. Jones
229 F.2d 648 (5th Cir. 1956) Cited 38 times
In Central of Ga. Ry. v. Jones, 229 F.2d 648 (5th Cir. 1956), the BRT and the railroad entered into a contract in 1952 whereby blacks were excluded from holding certain jobs even though they were represented by the BRT.
Richardson v. Texas and New Orleans Rd. Co.
242 F.2d 230 (5th Cir. 1957) Cited 28 times
No. 16142. March 14, 1957. Rehearing Denied June 11, 1957. Joseph C. Waddy, William C. Gardner, Washington, D.C., Roberson L. King, Houston, Tex., for appellants. George L. Schmidt, Houston, Tex., J. Hart Willis, Dallas, Tex., Wayland K. Sullivan, Cleveland, Ohio, Hugh M. Patterson, John B. Abercrombie, M.L. Null, Houston, Tex., for appellee, Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co., Baker, Botts, Andrews Shepherd, Houston, Tex., of counsel. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RIVES and TUTTLE, Circuit

Local 1367, Int.l Longshoremen's Association

9 Cited authorities

Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

In Tunstall v. Brotherhood, 323 U.S. 210, the federal right was derived from the federal duty of the union to act as bargaining representative for all members of the union.

Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

In Hughes Tool Co. v. NLRB, 147 F.2d 69 (5th Cir. 1945), the court dealt with a prior version of § 9(a) which did not expressly guarantee the Union's right to be present at the adjustment of grievances. Nevertheless, the court found that such a right existed, and stated that it could be waived.

In Central of Ga. Ry. v. Jones, 229 F.2d 648 (5th Cir. 1956), the BRT and the railroad entered into a contract in 1952 whereby blacks were excluded from holding certain jobs even though they were represented by the BRT.