§
Local 814

26 Cited authorities

  1. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,217 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

  2. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight

    424 U.S. 554 (1976)   Cited 1,146 times
    Holding that employees can challenge final decision of arbitrator only if they "prove . . . the Union's breach of duty tainting the decision of the [arbitrator]"

  3. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 882 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

  4. Steele v. L. N.R. Co.

    323 U.S. 192 (1944)   Cited 962 times
    Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America

    391 U.S. 418 (1968)   Cited 215 times
    Holding that union could not expel member because he filed unfair labor practice charge against it without first exhausting internal remedies as provided in union constitution

  6. Emporium Capwell Co. v. Western Addition Community Organization

    420 U.S. 50 (1975)   Cited 125 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that wildcat strikers are bargaining separately and are therefore not protected by the NLRA

  7. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

  8. De Arroyo v. Sindicato De Trabajadores Packinghouse

    425 F.2d 281 (1st Cir. 1970)   Cited 155 times
    Upholding breach of duty of fair representation verdict because, in part, union failed to properly calculate plaintiffs' seniority when processing grievance

  9. Dutrisac v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.

    749 F.2d 1270 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 96 times
    Holding that a union's failure to perform the "mechanical function" of attending to deadlines is ministerial conduct

  10. Ruzicka v. General Motors Corporation

    523 F.2d 306 (6th Cir. 1975)   Cited 115 times
    Finding inexplicable delay in pursuing grievances to be a breach of the DFR and stating, “The requirement of exhaustion of intra-Union remedies is bottomed on the hope that such procedures will quickly resolve disputes without the delay inherent in the judicial process and with the aid of persons experienced at resolving member-union conflicts short of a full-blown judicial proceeding. When that hope has failed, however, the member is not barred from proceeding to federal court with a claim of unfair representation.”