Local 1, Int'l Brotherhood Electrical Workers

4 Cited authorities

  1. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Local 182, Int. Bro. of Teamsters

    314 F.2d 53 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 26 times

    No. 224, Docket 27524. Argued December 4, 1962. Decided January 28, 1963. Norton J. Come, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, James C. Paras and Lee M. Modjeska, Washington, D.C., Attys.), for petitioner. George Schiro, Utica, N.Y., submitted brief for respondent. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges. FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement

  3. Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    191 F.2d 642 (D.C. Cir. 1951)   Cited 27 times
    In Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. NLRB, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 155, 191 F.2d 642, 28 A.L.R.2d 377, cert. denied, 342 U.S. 869, 72 S.Ct. 110, 96 L.Ed. 653 (1951), we held that the word "employees," as used in section 2(5) to define "labor organization," was not itself to be defined in its generic sense. It was to be given only the meaning attributed to it by section 2(3) when the question before the court was whether a given organization was subject to the restrictions of the secondary boycott provision.
  4. United Steelworkers of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    289 F.2d 591 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 8 times

    No. 137, Docket 26252. Argued January 5, 1961. Decided May 3, 1961. Jerry D. Anker, Arthur J. Goldberg, Washington, D.C. (David E. Feller, Washington, D.C., Samuel L. Rothbard, Abraham L. Friedman, Rothbard, Harris Oxfeld, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for petitioners. Melvin J. Welles, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Judith Bleich Kahn, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.