§

Loc. 959, Teamsters

167 N.L.R.B. 1042 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
Loc. 959, Teamsters

4 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  2. Virginia Electric Co. v. Board

    319 U.S. 533 (1943)   Cited 326 times
    Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Food Fair Stores, Inc.

    307 F.2d 3 (3d Cir. 1962)   Cited 15 times
    Affirming Board's position narrowly construing section 8 because while "the Act does not forbid the union from demanding money in addition to `periodic dues' . . . it [i]s prevented from requesting the discharge of an employee who refuse to pay the additional charge."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Bakery Confectionery Wkrs

    245 F.2d 211 (3d Cir. 1957)   Cited 3 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Bakery Confectionery Wkrs., 3 Cir., 245 F.2d 211, relied upon by Union, the bylaws fixing dues were couched in terms of allowing a discount from the stated monthly dues figure, if payment was made before the last day of the month in which dues were payable. The Third Circuit viewed this structure as affording the member an option to receive a benefit and the member's failure to take advantage of the discount could in no way be deemed as an assessment of a penalty.