11 Cited authorities
Thomas v. Collins
323 U.S. 516 (1945) Cited 886 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that a state may regulate labor unions but "[s]uch regulation ... must not trespass upon the domain set apart for ... free assembly"
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 495 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
I.A. of M. v. Labor Board
311 U.S. 72 (1940) Cited 317 timesIn International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Federbush Co.
121 F.2d 954 (2d Cir. 1941) Cited 85 times 2 Legal AnalysesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Federbush Co., 121 Fed. 2d 954, decided July 18, 1941, the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was written by Judge Learned Hand.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward
157 F.2d 486 (8th Cir. 1946) Cited 50 timesIn NLRB v. Montgomery Ward Co., 157 F.2d 486 (8th Cir. 1946), the employees remained on their job but refused to handle any clerical work originating from another of the employer's plants which was on strike.
Bonwit Teller, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
197 F.2d 640 (2d Cir. 1952) Cited 29 timesIn Bonwit Teller, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 197 F.2d 640, 645, it appeared that the Board, apparently because of considerations mentioned in the May case, supra, having authorized a practice of allowing retail department stores the privilege of prohibiting all solicitation within the selling areas of the stores during both working and non-working hours, Bonwit Teller, a retail department store, availed itself of that privilege.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Am. Tube Bend. Co.
134 F.2d 993 (2d Cir. 1943) Cited 25 timesNo. 196. April 5, 1943. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against the American Tube Bending Company for an order of the Circuit Court of Appeals to compel respondent's compliance with an order of the National Labor Relations Board entered on September 18, 1942. Order reversed and proceeding dismissed. Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert B. Watts, General Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Associate General Counsel, and Joseph B. Robison, and Irene R. Shriber, Attorneys, National
National Labor Rel. Board v. Clark Bros. Co.
163 F.2d 373 (2d Cir. 1947) Cited 16 timesNo. 268, Docket 20375. July 29, 1947. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order directing Clark Bros. Company, Inc., to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices. Enforcement granted. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, General Counsel, Morris P. Glushien, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Leonard Appel and Mozart G. Ratner, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Maurice F. Hanning and McAfee, Grossman, Taplin, Hanning, Newcomer
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Am. Tube Bending Co.
205 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1953) Cited 3 timesHolding that an employer was not entitled to a rehearing before the Board concerning a violation found by the ALJ that had not been charged in the complaint and that had not been considered or argued by either party
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.. v. Cities Service Oil
122 F.2d 149 (2d Cir. 1941) Cited 11 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Cities Service Oil Co., 2 Cir., 122 F.2d 149, we held that a shipowner must give passes to union representatives to board ships in order to learn what grievances, if any, the crew might have, that being the only effective way open to secure redress.