ยง

Litton Business Systems, Inc.

286 N.L.R.B. 817 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Litton Business Systems, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Bakery Workers

    430 U.S. 243 (1977)   Cited 531 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration clause survived the expiration of the CBA, even though the agreement was silent as to survival

  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  3. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  4. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 269 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  5. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under ยง 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  6. Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers v. C.R.S.T

    795 F.2d 1400 (8th Cir. 1986)   Cited 42 times
    Holding that an employer's past refusal to arbitrate grievances under unilaterally instituted terms and conditions of employment as well as its implementation of a new grievance procedure limited to only one specific type of dispute manifested an objective intent by the employer not to be bound by the expired agreement's arbitration provision

  7. Industrial Un. of Mar. Ship. W. v. N.L.R.B

    320 F.2d 615 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 63 times   4 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 14052, 14102. Argued May 21, 1963. Decided July 30, 1963. M.H. Goldstein, Philadelphia, Pa. (Goldstein Barkan, Michael Brodie, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner, Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, AFL-CIO. John H. Morse, New York City (Frank Cummings, New York City, Cravath, Swaine Moore, New York City, on the brief), for Bethlehem Steel Co. (Shipbuilding Division). Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli

  8. L. 703, Int'l Broth. of Teamsters v. Kennicott

    771 F.2d 300 (7th Cir. 1985)   Cited 23 times
    Affirming district court's refusal to order arbitration of post-expiration grievance that occurred six months after parties' agreement expired

  9. Brockway Motor Trucks, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    582 F.2d 720 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 23 times
    Holding that closing down of an employer's plant falls within statutory phrase "terms and conditions of employment"

  10. Continental Insurance Company v. N.L.R.B

    495 F.2d 44 (2d Cir. 1974)   Cited 27 times
    In Continental Insurance Co. v. NLRB, 495 F.2d 44 (2d Cir. 1974), a finding of bad faith was predicated in part on (1) the company's refusal to recognize the union as the sole and exclusive bargaining representative unless the union agreed not to organize or represent other company employees, (2) the company's insistence that arbitrators of grievances be picked exclusively by the company and (3) wage, vacation and severance pay proposals substantially less generous than the benefits provided to employees before the union was certified.