§

Lincoln Center For The Performing Arts

340 N.L.R.B. 1100 (N.L.R.B. 2003)
Lincoln Center For The Performing Arts

33 Cited authorities

  1. New Hampshire v. Maine

    532 U.S. 742 (2001)   Cited 4,662 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under the doctrine of judicial estoppel, “New Hampshire is equitably barred from asserting—contrary to its position in the 1970's litigation—that the inland Piscataqua River boundary runs along the Maine shore”

  2. Perry Ed. Assn. v. Perry Local Educators' Assn

    460 U.S. 37 (1983)   Cited 2,290 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions on speech must be "narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, and leave open ample alternative channels of communication"

  3. Frisby v. Schultz

    487 U.S. 474 (1988)   Cited 916 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that residential streets are traditional public fora

  4. International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness v. Lee

    505 U.S. 672 (1992)   Cited 616 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that speech restrictions in nonpublic fora must be viewpoint-neutral

  5. United States v. Grace

    461 U.S. 171 (1983)   Cited 825 times
    Holding that because "[t]here is no separation, no fence, and no indication whatever to persons stepping from the street to the curb and sidewalks that serve as the perimeter of the Court grounds that they have entered some special type of enclave," the public sidewalks surrounding the Supreme Court were public fora and noting that "[t]here is nothing to indicate to the public that these sidewalks are part of the Supreme Court grounds or are in any way different from other public sidewalks in the city"

  6. Hague v. C.I.O

    307 U.S. 496 (1939)   Cited 1,615 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to establish a claim under the Privileges and Immunities Clause, plaintiffs must allege discrimination on the basis of out-of-state residency

  7. Food Employees v. Logan Plaza

    391 U.S. 308 (1968)   Cited 379 times
    Extending Marsh to cover a private shopping center to the extent that it sought to restrict speech about its businesses

  8. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent

  9. Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 100 v. City of New York Department of Parks & Recreation

    311 F.3d 534 (2d Cir. 2002)   Cited 245 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that Lincoln Center Plaza had not been dedicated as a public park

  10. Liona Corp. v. PCH Associates (In re PCH Associates)

    949 F.2d 585 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 334 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in order to establish a defense of collateral estoppel, the party asserting the defense must show that the issues in the two proceedings are identical; that the issue raised in the current action was actually decided in the prior proceeding; there was full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the prior proceeding; and the issue previously decided was necessary to support a final judgment on the merits

  11. Section 140.00 - Criminal trespass and burglary; definitions of terms

    N.Y. Penal Law § 140.00   Cited 440 times
    Involving a "building" which "in addition to its ordinary meaning, includes any structure, vehicle or watercraft used for overnight lodging of persons, or used by persons for carrying on business therein, or used as an elementary or secondary school, or an inclosed motor truck, or an inclosed motor truck trailer."