§

Lima Electric Products, Inc.

104 N.L.R.B. 344 (N.L.R.B. 1953)
Lima Electric Products, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Communications Assn. v. Douds

    339 U.S. 382 (1950)   Cited 654 times
    Holding that speech-contingent withdrawal of opportunity to invoke the facilities of the National Labor Relations Board improperly abridged speech

  2. Am. Crystal Sugar Co. v. Mandeville Island Farms

    343 U.S. 957 (1952)   Cited 62 times
    Holding a limited publication "communicates the contents of a [work] to a definitely selected group and for a limited purpose,. . . ."

  3. Labor Board v. Highland Park Co.

    341 U.S. 322 (1951)   Cited 63 times
    In Highland it was claimed that the term "national or international labor organization" as used in the National Labor Relations Act is a technical one, meaning "union", thereby excluding the CIO, which was "a federation".

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. General Armature & Mfg. Co.

    192 F.2d 316 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 14 times

    No. 10472. Argued October 4, 1951. Filed November 7, 1951. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C., (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant Gen. Counsel, and Thomas F. Maher, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Marvin C. Wahl, Baltimore, Md. (Blanche Genauer Wahl, Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for respondent. Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY, and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. HASTIE, Circuit Judge. Two principal contentions are advanced