Lillian Abrahamson Nursing Home

Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
General Elec., Battery Prod., v. N.L.R.B
400 F.2d 713 (5th Cir. 1968) Cited 24 times
No. 24548. August 22, 1968. Rehearing Denied October 28, 1968. Robert C. Lanquist, Otto R.T. Bowden, Jacksonville, Fla., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Thomas R. Beech, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Frank Hamilton, Jr., Tampa, Fla., amicus curiae. Before BELL, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges. GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: In our assessment of another industrial drama, we again turn to the rise and decline of a local union: its birth and early struggles