§

Liberty Source W, LLC

344 N.L.R.B. 1127 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
Liberty Source W, LLC

9 Cited authorities

  1. Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd., Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Int'l Union, AFL-CIO

    417 U.S. 249 (1974)   Cited 366 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding under NLRA that purchaser of hotel assets was not required to arbitrate with union about its decision not to hire all of seller’s employees

  2. Stardyne, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    41 F.3d 141 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that the Board's alter ego analysis involved a policy choice that is consistent with the Act

  3. Industrial Turnaround v. N.L.R.B

    115 F.3d 248 (4th Cir. 1997)   Cited 34 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that one panel may not overrule another

  4. J. M. Tanaka Const., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    675 F.2d 1029 (9th Cir. 1982)   Cited 55 times
    Holding that common ownership is but one factor to be considered by the Board and it "is not a necessary prerequisite to an alter ego finding."

  5. Lincoln Park Zoological Society v. Natioanal Labor Relations Board

    116 F.3d 216 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 15 times
    Applying the successorship principle in the context of a public to private transition

  6. N.L.R.B. v. United Technologies Corp.

    884 F.2d 1569 (2d Cir. 1989)   Cited 18 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 1095, 1096, Dockets 89-4003, 89-4009. Argued May 8, 1989. Decided September 13, 1989. Edward J. Dempsey, Director, Indus. Relations Labor Counsel, United Technologies Corp., Hartford, Conn., for respondent/intervenor United Technologies Corp. Judith P. Flower, Washington, D.C. (Barbara A. Atkin, Supervisory Attorney, Joseph E. Desio, Acting Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for

  7. Fugazy Continental Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    725 F.2d 1416 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 23 times
    Affirming alter ego finding where only portion of company's operations were shut and transferred to a new, "sham" company established to perform the same work

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Laborers' Int. Union, N. America

    748 F.2d 1001 (5th Cir. 1984)   Cited 4 times
    Declining to deduct expenses for transportation, lodging and meals that the discriminatees would have incurred had they been employed during the backpay period

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second