Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
  2. Automobile Workers v. Russell

    356 U.S. 634 (1958)   Cited 314 times
    Holding that state tort claim for wrongful interference with a lawful business relationship was not preempted where there were threats of violence
  3. Marriott Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    491 F.2d 367 (9th Cir. 1974)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 72-1990, 72-2129, 72-2207. January 9, 1974. Rehearing Denied February 7, 1974. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Allison W. Brown, Jr. (argued), Washington, D.C., Abraham Siegel, Director, Region 31, NLRB, Los Angeles, Cal., for NLRB. David A. Maddux, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter Hampton, Los Angeles, Cal., A. D. Gallay (argued), Fellner Rovins, New York City, for Lufthansa. Robert M. Simpson, Rose, Klein Marias, Los Angeles, Cal., Plato E. Papps, Washington, D.C., for IAM. Charles

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. WTVJ, Inc.

    268 F.2d 346 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 16 times
    Enforcing Board decision that found violation based on a theory of wrongdoing different from the theory relied upon by the ALJ
  5. N.L.R.B. v. LOCAL UNION 396, INT. BRO

    509 F.2d 1075 (9th Cir. 1975)   Cited 1 times
    In NLRB v. Local Union 396, 509 F.2d 1075, 1079 (9th Cir. 1975), the court ruled that although an "order compelling the Union to pay counsel fees was within the [Board's] zone of discretion," the Board needed to explain why, in the circumstances there presented, it ordered the union to pay "attorney's fees as opposed to fees for a paraprofessional."
  6. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,049 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB
  7. Section 102.46 - Exceptions and brief in support; answering briefs to exceptions; cross-exceptions and brief in support; answering briefs to cross-exceptions; reply briefs; failure to except; oral argument; filing requirements; amicus curiae briefs

    29 C.F.R. § 102.46   Cited 103 times
    Providing that the answering brief to exceptions "must be limited to the questions raised in the exceptions," "must present clearly the points of fact and law relied on in support of the position taken on each question," and "must specify those pages of the record which the party contends support the Judge's finding"