LHoist North America of Alabama, LLC, a subsidiary of LHoist North America

33 Cited authorities

  1. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 195 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity
  2. Romano v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith

    487 U.S. 1205 (1988)   Cited 105 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding conclusion that employees classified as department managers did not meet executive exemption
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 355 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  4. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"
  5. United States v. Cephus

    684 F.3d 703 (7th Cir. 2012)   Cited 74 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a victim's prior prostitution "does not suggest" that she voluntarily prostituted for the defendant or consented to beatings and threats
  6. Bally's Park Place Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    646 F.3d 929 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 39 times
    Finding unlawful motive where employee's discharge came only days after manager observed him at pro-union rally
  7. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 80 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."
  8. N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service

    8 F.3d 832 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 48 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Upholding postal service's exercise of contractual right to reduce employees' hours in response to budget reduction
  9. SCA Tissue North America LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    371 F.3d 983 (7th Cir. 2004)   Cited 32 times
    Finding employer terminated employee based on antiunion animus in part because of employer's comment about employee's "attitude"
  10. Airgas U.S., LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    916 F.3d 555 (6th Cir. 2019)   Cited 8 times
    Finding period of "just under a month" between protected activity and discipline supported finding of animus
  11. Rule 611 - Mode and Order of Examining Witnesses and Presenting Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 611   Cited 1,899 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Granting trial judge broad discretion to control witness examination
  12. Section 32-9-20 - [Effective Until 10/1/2024] Schedule of restrictions

    Ala. Code § 32-9-20   Cited 3 times

    (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to drive or move on any highway in this state any vehicle or vehicles of a size or weight except in accordance with the following: (1) WIDTH. Vehicles and combinations of vehicles, operating on highways No passenger vehicle shall carry any load extending beyond the line of the fenders. No vehicle hauling forest products or culvert pipe on any highway in this state shall have a load exceeding 102 inches in width. (2) HEIGHT. No vehicle or semitrailer or trailer