§

Lexus of Concord, Inc.

343 N.L.R.B. 851 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
Lexus of Concord, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    517 U.S. 781 (1996)   Cited 59 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB is due "considerable deference . . . by virtue of its charge to develop national labor policy"

  2. Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    117 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

  3. Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    28 F.3d 1243 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 28 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stressing appropriateness of bargaining order to remedy bad faith bargaining during certification year

  4. V & S ProGalv, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    168 F.3d 270 (6th Cir. 1999)   Cited 19 times
    Finding that a bargaining order "was the proper remedy where the Board found several violations of § 8 and, as such, the likelihood of ensuring a fair election was slight"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Williams Enterprises, Inc.

    50 F.3d 1280 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times
    Upholding finding of causation where four months passed between company's anti-union statements and decertification petition

  6. BPH & Co. ex rel. HEPC Palmas, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    333 F.3d 213 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 6 times
    Holding a petitioner satisfied § 10(e) by briefing an argument before the Board despite it’s not having been in the petitioner’s exceptions

  7. International Union Local 150 v. N.L.R.B

    47 F.3d 218 (7th Cir. 1995)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 94-1583, 94-1848. Argued November 10, 1994. Decided February 8, 1995. Louis E. Sigman, Dale D. Pierson (argued), Pasquale A. Fioretto, Brian C. Hlavin, Baum, Sigman, Auerbach, Pierson Neuman, Chicago, IL, for International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO. Elizabeth Kinney, Librado Arreola, N.L.R.B., Chicago, IL, Aileen A. Armstrong, Linda J. Dreeben, Deborah E. Shrager (argued), N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Ellen A. Farrell, Corinna L. Metcalf, Injunction

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Accurate Web, Inc.

    818 F.2d 273 (2d Cir. 1987)   Cited 3 times

    No. 759, Docket 86-4145. Argued January 30, 1987. Decided May 6, 1987. Frederick D. Braid, Mineola, N.Y. (Rains Pogrebin, P.C., Mineola, N.Y., of counsel) for respondent. John D. Burgoyne, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (W. Christian Schumann, Supervisory Atty., Rosemary M. Collyer, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel) for petitioner. Mark D. Risk, New York

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Vantran Elec. Corp.

    580 F.2d 921 (7th Cir. 1978)   Cited 8 times
    In NLRB v. Vantran Electric Corp., 580 F.2d 921, 924-25 (7th Cir. 1978), this circuit noted the distinction between formal and informal settlements.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Key Motors Corporation

    579 F.2d 1388 (7th Cir. 1978)   Cited 5 times

    No. 77-2240. Argued May 22, 1978. Decided August 9, 1978. Michael Murchison, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Arthur D. Rutkowski, Evansville, Ind., for respondent. Before PELL and WOOD, Circuit Judges, and HARPER, Senior District Judge. Senior United States District Judge Roy W. Harper of the Eastern and Western Districts of Missouri is sitting by designation. PELL, Circuit Judge. The sole issue in this application for enforcement is whether the National Labor Relations Board (Board)