Lewis Tree Service, Inc.
3 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.
356 U.S. 342 (1958) Cited 296 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under ยง 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
Labor Board v. Mexia Textile Mills
339 U.S. 563 (1950) Cited 132 timesReasoning that Board's entitlement to enforcement prevents cases from becoming moot because it "adds to existing sanctions that of punishment for contempt"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Southern California Pipe Trades District Council No. 16 of United Ass'n
449 F.2d 668 (9th Cir. 1971) Cited 4 timesNos. 26570, 26572. August 25, 1971. Daniel Katz, NLRB (argued), Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Ralph E. Kennedy, Director, NLRB, Los Angeles, Cal., for NLRB. Eugene Miller (argued), of Brundage, Neyhart, Miller, Ross Reich, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents in 26570. Brundage Hackler, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent in 26572. Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge. Honorable William M. Byrne, United States District Judge, Central District