10 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.
462 U.S. 393 (1983) Cited 652 times 11 Legal AnalysesHolding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Eastern Maine Medical Center v. N.L.R.B
658 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 22 timesAffirming bargaining order "in view of the serious and pervasive violations disclosed in the record"
Roadway Exp., Inc. v. N.L.R.B
647 F.2d 415 (4th Cir. 1981) Cited 15 timesNo. 80-1520. Argued January 6, 1981. Decided April 24, 1981. Frank W. Stegman, Washington, D.C. (Charles P. O'Connor, Morgan, Lewis Bockius, Washington, D.C., Jack F. Canady, Jack E. Thornton, Jr., Blackwell, Blackwell, Canady Eller, Winston-Salem, N.C., on brief), for petitioner. Christopher W. Katzenbach, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel
Time-O-Matic, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
264 F.2d 96 (7th Cir. 1959) Cited 32 timesNo. 12424. March 5, 1959. Edward B. Miller, Merrill Shepard, Willis S. Ryza, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner, Time-O-Matic, Inc. Pope Ballard, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioner. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fred S. Landess, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge and HASTINGS and PARKINSON, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. Petitioner
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works
153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946) Cited 47 timesNoting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Isis Plumbing & Heating Co.
322 F.2d 913 (9th Cir. 1963) Cited 18 timesNo. 18364. September 23, 1963. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles and Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Hill, Farrer Burrill, Carl M. Gould and Stanley E. Tobin, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before HAMLEY, JERTBERG and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. JERTBERG, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter
N.L.R.B. v. Tesoro Petroleum Corporation
431 F.2d 95 (9th Cir. 1970) Cited 11 timesNo. 24918. August 4, 1970. Warren M. Davison (argued), Leonard M. Wagman, Sanford H. Fisher, Attys., Marcel Mallet-Provost, Dominick L. Manoli, Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C., Abraham Siegel, Regional Atty., N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Hugh M. Smith (argued), Schoolfield Smith, Dallas, Tex., John R. Tadlock, Gen. Counsel, Int. Union, Denver, Colo., for petitioner. Before KOELSCH and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and HALL, District Judge. Honorable Peirson M. Hall, Senior United States
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"
Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest
26 U.S.C. § 6621 Cited 1,873 times 23 Legal AnalysesApplying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions