§

LESLIE'S POOLMART, INC.

362 NLRB No. 184 (N.L.R.B. 2015)
LESLIE'S POOLMART, INC.

20 Cited authorities

  1. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion

    563 U.S. 333 (2011)   Cited 3,946 times   602 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"

  2. Volt Info. Scis., Inc. v. Bd. of Trs.

    489 U.S. 468 (1989)   Cited 3,281 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Federal Arbitration Act requires courts to enforce arbitration agreements according to their terms, including where the parties "specify by contract the rules under which arbitration will be conducted"

  3. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 978 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  4. BEK CONSTR. CO. v. NLRB

    536 U.S. 516 (2002)   Cited 310 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment right to petition the government extends to the courts

  5. New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.

    560 U.S. 674 (2010)   Cited 141 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum

  6. Romano v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith

    487 U.S. 1205 (1988)   Cited 105 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding conclusion that employees classified as department managers did not meet executive exemption

  7. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013)   Cited 141 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced

  8. Canning v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013)   Cited 96 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a challenge qualifies as an "extraordinary circumstance"

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    570 U.S. 916 (2013)   Cited 11 times   2 Legal Analyses

    No. 12–1281. 2013-06-24 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, petitioner, v. Noel CANNING, et al. Case below, 705 F.3d 490. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted. In addition to the questions presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Whether the President's recess-appointment power may be exercised when the Senate is convening every three days in pro forma sessions.

  10. Hernandez v. Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc.

    174 Cal.App.4th 1441 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reversing order that attorney who improperly communicated with represented class members pay defense counsel and class counsel's attorneys' fees; "[Code Civ. Proc., §] 128 does not provide a court with the power to impose such sanctions."

  11. Section 2699 - Civil penalty; civil action by aggrieved employee to recover

    Cal. Lab. Code § 2699   Cited 1,365 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Providing that "[a]ny employee who prevails in any action" shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees

  12. Section 382 - Party not consenting to joinder as plaintiff made defendant

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 382   Cited 924 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Setting forth the requirements for class action certification