§

Lenox Hill Hospital

362 NLRB No. 16 (N.L.R.B. 2015)
Lenox Hill Hospital

8 Cited authorities

  1. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  2. New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.

    560 U.S. 674 (2010)   Cited 141 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum

  3. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 227 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  5. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    288 F.3d 434 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 12 times
    Noting that relevant information requests are presumed to have been made in good faith "until the company demonstrates otherwise"

  6. KLB Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    700 F.3d 551 (D.C. Cir. 2012)   Cited 2 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 11–1280 11–1322. 2012-12-4 KLB INDUSTRIES, INC., doing business as National Extrusion and Manufacturing Co., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW, Intervenor. On Petition for Review and Cross–Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Kerry P. Hastings argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. David Seid, Attorney, National Labor

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Pan American Grain Co., Inc.

    432 F.3d 69 (1st Cir. 2005)   Cited 4 times
    Noting that the court did not "understand the [NLRB's] rationale" and that while the Board's "result may or may not be sound, . . . until we understand its basis, we cannot effectively review it"

  8. Chesapeake Potomac Telephone Co. v. N.L.R.B

    687 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that waiver of statutory rights can be effectuated only if "intent to waive is clear and unmistakable from the evidence presented"