§
Lemon Drop Inn

9 Cited authorities

  1. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Jamaica Towing, Inc.

    632 F.2d 208 (2d Cir. 1980)   Cited 50 times
    Holding that "hallmark" violations of NLRA "include such employer misbehavior as the closing of a plant or threats of plant closure or loss of employment, the grant of benefits to employees, or the reassignment, demotion or discharge of union adherents" and lesser violations "include such employer misconduct as interrogating employees regarding their union sympathies, holding out a `carrot' of promised benefits, expressing anti-union resolve, threatening that unionization will result in decreased benefits, or suggesting that physical force might be used to exclude the union"

  4. Midwest Stock Exchange, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    635 F.2d 1255 (7th Cir. 1980)   Cited 31 times
    In Midwest Stock Exch., Inc. v. NLRB, 635 F.2d 1255 (7th Cir. 1980), the court found that an employer discriminatorily enforced its no-solicitation rule by strictly enforcing the rule against union activities but permitting "[s]uch drives as the Crusade of Mercy, collection of blood in a bloodmobile... [on the employer's] premises, the selling of Avon products, Tupperware, boat cruise tickets, raffle tickets, Girl Scout cookies, and a number of other items."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Dan River Mills, Incorporated

    274 F.2d 381 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 61 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Dan River Mills, Inc., 5 Cir., 274 F.2d 381, the unit consisted of 332 employees of which 167 constituted a majority.

  6. United States v. Mitchell

    558 F.2d 1332 (8th Cir. 1977)   Cited 11 times
    In United States v. Mitchell, 558 F.2d 1332, 1335 (8th Cir. 1977), the defendant signed a written waiver of his Miranda rights, told police an exculpatory story and failed to elaborate when the police were unable to verify it. The opinions in those cases did not address the distinction between using post-arrest silence to impeach a defendant's credibility and using it to impeach the substance of his exculpatory story.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Service Garage, Inc.

    668 F.2d 247 (6th Cir. 1982)

    No. 80-1298. January 5, 1982. Elliott Moore, Andrew Tranovich, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Donald R. Wellford, Boone, Wellford, Clark, Langschmidt Pemberton, Memphis, Tenn., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRITT and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. ORDER On February 7, 1980, the National Labor Relations Board found that respondent Service Garage committed unfair labor practices during an organizing campaign

  8. Choc-Ola Bottlers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    478 F.2d 461 (7th Cir. 1973)   Cited 5 times
    In Choc-Ola Bottlers, Inc. v. NLRB, 478 F.2d 461 (7th Cir. 1973), this court reviewed a person's eligibility to vote in a Board election.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. J.W. Mays, Inc.

    356 F.2d 693 (2d Cir. 1966)   Cited 7 times

    No. 76, Docket 29497. Argued November 12, 1965. Decided March 2, 1966. Leonard M. Wagman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, NLRB, on the brief), for petitioner. Seymour W. Miller, New York City (Miller Seeger, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and FRIENDLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. J. JOSEPH SMITH, Circuit Judge: The