§

Leiter Manufacturing Co.

112 N.L.R.B. 843 (N.L.R.B. 1955)
Leiter Manufacturing Co.

19 Cited authorities

  1. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kobritz

    193 F.2d 8 (1st Cir. 1951)   Cited 43 times
    Upholding an NLRB departure from a policy of declining to assert jurisdiction, on the ground that "the Board had jurisdiction all the time"

  4. Kansas Milling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    185 F.2d 413 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 36 times

    No. 4036. November 9, 1950. Rehearing Denied December 11, 1950. George Siefkin, Wichita, Kan. (Carl T. Smith, Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for petitioner. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Washington D.C., and Leonard S. Kimmell, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This case is here on the petition of the Kansas Milling

  5. Tampa Times Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    193 F.2d 582 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 30 times
    Noting the presence of uncontradicted testimony in the record that persons responsible for plaintiff's discharge were unaware of his union activities, and concluding that the "inference that he was discharged on account of such activities may not be drawn merely from the fact that the activities preceded the discharge"

  6. Armstrong Cork Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 27 times
    In Armstrong Cork Co. v. NLRB, 211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954), an employer announced to an assembly of workers shortly after a representation election that he intended to remove a "pledge" which the Company had posted on the bulletin board setting forth employees' rights.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pecheur Lozenge Co.

    209 F.2d 393 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Pecheur Lozenge Co., 2 Cir., 209 F.2d 393, 403, 404, it was held an unfair labor practice to insist that a strike be called off as a condition of bargaining.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. National Paper Co.

    216 F.2d 859 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 25 times

    No. 14945. November 16, 1954. John S. Patton, Atty. N.L.R.B., Atlanta, Ga., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, Bernard Dunau, Robert G. Johnson, Attys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, John M. Slaton, M.A. Prowell, Atlanta, Ga., for National Paper Co., for respondent. Hugh Howell, Hugh Howell, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for Southern Detectives, Inc., and James M. Fier. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Epstein

    203 F.2d 482 (3d Cir. 1953)   Cited 23 times

    No. 10888. Argued January 23, 1953. Decided April 15, 1953. Rehearing Denied May 7, 1953. Harvey B. Diamond, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bernard Dunau, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. James M. Quigley, Harrisburg, Pa. (Samuel A. Schreckengaust, Jr., McNees, Wallace Nurick, Harrisburg, Pa., on the brief), for respondents. Before GOODRICH, STALEY

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Jackson Press

    201 F.2d 541 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 23 times

    No. 10702. January 29, 1953. David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Louis Schwartz, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, General Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John H. Doesburg, Jr., Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before DUFFY, FINNEGAN and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter called