Lehigh Portland Cement Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    170 F.2d 247 (7th Cir. 1949)   Cited 156 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Accepting the Board's conclusion "that the term `wages' . . . must be construed to include emoluments of value, like pension and insurance benefits, which may accrue to employees out of their employment relationship"
  2. W.W. Cross Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    174 F.2d 875 (1st Cir. 1949)   Cited 52 times
    Holding that " 'wages' " in the NLRA "embraces within its meaning direct and immediate economic benefits flowing from the employment relationship covers a group insurance program"
  3. National Labor Rel. Board v. Hart Cotton Mills

    190 F.2d 964 (4th Cir. 1951)   Cited 17 times

    No. 6262. Argued June 11, 1951. Decided July 31, 1951. Elizabeth W. Weston, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Owsley Vose, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Whiteford S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C. (Henry C. Bourne, Tarboro, N.C., and Pierce Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before PARKER

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. Bell Oil Gas Co.

    91 F.2d 509 (5th Cir. 1937)   Cited 19 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Bell Oil Gas Company, 5 Cir., 91 F.2d 509, 514, we pointed out that the functions of courts in the operation of the act is by no means perfunctory. Upon them rests the final judicial responsibility; from them emanates the sole authority for making the Board's orders coercively effective.
  5. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Abbott Worsted Mills

    127 F.2d 438 (1st Cir. 1942)   Cited 14 times

    No. 3752. April 23, 1942. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order entered by the board against Abbott Worsted Mills, Inc. Decree enforcing order. William S. Gordon, Jr., of Boston, Mass. (Robert B. Watts, Ernest A. Gross, Gerhard P. Van Arkel, and Thomas E. Shroyer, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. John P. Carleton, of Manchester, N.H. (McLane, Davis Carleton, of Manchester

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Stowe Spinning Co.

    165 F.2d 609 (4th Cir. 1947)   Cited 8 times
    Noting that meeting hall had been used for such purposes as church banquets, Ladies Aid Society meetings, and a Christmas party for school children