Legal Services of N. CA

10 Cited authorities

  1. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.

    486 U.S. 399 (1988)   Cited 2,105 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a retaliatory discharge claim was not preempted because the elements of the state tort did not necessitate interpretation of a labor contract
  2. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 228 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"
  4. J.I. Case Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 332 (1944)   Cited 457 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the result of a collective bargaining agreement is not "a contract of employment except in rare cases; no one has a job by reason of it and no obligation to any individual ordinarily comes into existence from it alone"
  5. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
  6. Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 55 times
    Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"
  7. Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.

    117 Cal.App.4th 446 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 3 times

    A101477 Filed April 1, 2004 REVIEW GRANTED JUNE 23, 2004 Appeal from the Superior Court of San Francisco County, No. 412197, Hon. A. James Robertson, II, Judge. David S. Markun, Edward S. Zusman, Kevin K. Eng, Markun Zusman Compton LLP, Attorney for Appellants, Kelly Kearney and Mark Levy. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Richard M. Frank, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Herschel T. Elkins, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Margaret Reiter, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Attorney

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Leonard B. Hebert, Jr. Co.

    696 F.2d 1120 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that the union "has the initial burden of showing relevancy" where it alleges that the employer is using "double breasted operations" to evade contractual obligations with the union, i.e., the employer is allegedly operating two corporations, one hiring strictly union employees, and the other, nonunion employees, to compete for both union and nonunion work
  9. Western Massachusetts Elec. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    573 F.2d 101 (1st Cir. 1978)   Cited 12 times
    Acknowledging that when an employer makes "assertions, the duty to bargain in good faith required [the employer] to provide, upon demand, such information as was reasonably necessary to substantiate them"
  10. Section 631 - Unlawful tapping

    Cal. Pen. Code § 631   Cited 284 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting "any person who . . . makes any unauthorized connection . . . or who willfully and without the consent of all parties to the communication . . . reads, or attempts to read, or to learn the contents or meaning of any message is in transit or passing over any wire, line, or cable . . . "