Leeward Nursing Home

9 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely
  2. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred
  4. International Union

    459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”
  5. A.H. BELO CORPORATION

    411 F.2d 959 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 28 times
    Deciding that the employer engaged in dilatory tactics in “causing negotiations to drag out over a year ... delay[ing] negotiations two months in order to reply to the union's original proposal, and when it did, counter[ing] with a sketchy four page paper”
  6. Alaska Roughnecks Drillers Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    555 F.2d 732 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 7 times
    Discussing Ace-Alkire, 431 F.2d at 282.
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. System Council T-6

    599 F.2d 5 (1st Cir. 1979)   Cited 5 times

    No. 78-1396. Argued April 13, 1979. Decided May 22, 1979. David F. Zorensky, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Howard E. Perlstein, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief for petitioner. James O. Hall, Boston, Mass., with whom Angoff, Goldman, Manning, Pyle Wanger, Boston, Mass., was on brief for respondents. Joseph C. D'Arrigo

  8. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Nettleton Co.

    241 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 15 times

    No. 113, Docket 24181. Argued December 11, 1956. Decided January 21, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Owsley Vose and Rosanna A. Blake, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Bond, Schoeneck King, Syracuse, N.Y., Tracy H. Ferguson, Syracuse, N.Y., of counsel, for respondents. Before SWAN, MEDINA and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. SWAN, Circuit Judge. The Board's Decision and Order is reported in 108 N.L.R.B. 1670. It finds that the respondents have violated

  9. Exber, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    390 F.2d 127 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 3 times

    No. 21362. March 5, 1968. Fredrick N. Richman (argued), Sidney R. Korshak, David H. Mendelsohn, Chicago, Ill., for appellant. Harvey Letter (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Wayne S. Bishop, Joseph C. Thackery, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge. JAMESON, District Judge: This