§

Leeds Cablevision)

293 N.L.R.B. 931 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Leeds Cablevision)

7 Cited authorities

  1. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  2. Labor Board v. Warren Company

    350 U.S. 107 (1955)   Cited 39 times
    Noting that Congress gave the NLRB civil contempt power to enforce compliance with the NLRB's orders

  3. United Supermarkets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    862 F.2d 549 (5th Cir. 1989)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 88-4027. January 3, 1989. Don Graf, Dan G. Young, McCleskey, Harriger, Brazill Graf, Lubbock, Tex., for petitioner cross-respondent. Wm. M. Bernstein, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Aileen A. Armstrong, Barbara A. Atkin, Washington, D.C., Michael Dunn, Regional Director, NLRB, Edward B. Valverde, Fort Worth, Tex., for NLRB. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WILLIAMS and GARWOOD, Circuit Judges, and POLOZOLA,

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Schill Steel Products, Inc.

    480 F.2d 586 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 17 times
    Finding a two-year delay not unreasonable and noting that “[w]e do not encourage the N.L.R.B. to come to this court with contempt petitions as soon as they feel a violation of the order has occurred. This is especially true in the difficult area of labor relations where the Board may not be able to determine whether or not a significant violation has occurred until it has already done lengthy investigation, possibly including a full Board proceeding.”

  5. N.L.R.B. v. King Radio Corporation

    510 F.2d 1154 (10th Cir. 1975)   Cited 13 times

    No. 74-1421. Argued January 24, 1975. Decided February 12, 1975. Rehearing Denied March 24, 1975. Alan D. Longman, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and William H. DuRoss, III, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief) for petitioner. William G. Haynes, Topeka, Kan. (Eidson, Lewis, Porter Haynes, Topeka, Kan., on the brief) for respondent. Blake, Uhlig Funk, Kansas City, Kan

  6. N.L.R.B. v. C C Plywood Corporation

    413 F.2d 112 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 12 times

    No. 22305. June 6, 1969. Hans J. Lehmann (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., Thomas P. Graham, Director, NLRB, Seattle, Washington for petitioner. George J. Tichy (argued), Spokane, Wash., for respondent. Before BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge. Honorable William J. Jameson, United States Senior District Judge, Billings, Montana

  7. Poole Foundry Mach. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    192 F.2d 740 (4th Cir. 1951)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Poole the court upheld the Board's bargaining order, concluding that the employer's withdrawal of recognition of the union based on a decertification petition signed by sixty-four of sixty-six employees within four months of the employer's settlement agreement with the union violated section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act.