§

Lee Lumber & Building Material

306 N.L.R.B. 408 (N.L.R.B. 1992)
Lee Lumber & Building Material

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 270 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  3. Peerless of America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    484 F.2d 1108 (7th Cir. 1973)   Cited 52 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Peerless, we stated that the Board's decision to issue such an order must be accompanied by "`specific findings' as to the immediate and residual impact of unfair labor practices on the election process... and `a detailed analysis' assessing the possibility of holding a fair election... and the potential effectiveness of ordinary remedies."

  4. Allied Industrial Workers, AFL-CIO Local Union No. 289 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    476 F.2d 868 (D.C. Cir. 1973)   Cited 48 times
    Noting that "naked information" regarding the filing of a decertification petition without information regarding the number of signatories is insufficient to create good faith doubt of union majority status, even with additional evidence present

  5. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Proler Intern. Corp.

    635 F.2d 351 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 17 times
    In Proler the court held that the evidence was insufficient to show that an economic work stoppage was converted to an unfair labor practice strike where the record showed that a company vice-president told employees that if they did not return to work they would lose their jobs.

  7. Superior Bakery, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    893 F.2d 493 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 6 times
    Finding that individual had supervisory assignment authority "because he would select the people necessary to do the work at the times he chose," thereby demonstrating that he exercised independent judgment

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Nu-Southern Dyeing Finishing

    444 F.2d 11 (4th Cir. 1971)   Cited 14 times

    No. 14960. Argued April 5, 1971. Decided May 28, 1971. Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marjorie S. Gofreed, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner. Ernest W. Machen, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for respondents. Before BRYAN, WINTER and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges. WINTER, Circuit Judge: Nu-Southern Dyeing Finishing, Inc. and