§

Leatherwood Drilling Co.

179 N.L.R.B. 549 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Leatherwood Drilling Co.

17 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wyman-Gordon Co.

    394 U.S. 759 (1969)   Cited 809 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication

  2. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  3. Labor Board v. I. M. Electric Co.

    318 U.S. 9 (1943)   Cited 108 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Indiana Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, at page 28, 63 S.Ct. 394, at page 405, 87 L.Ed. 579, the Supreme Court stated the general fundamental principles with respect to findings of fact by the Board, saying that the reviewing court is given discretion to see that before a party's rights are foreclosed his case has been fairly heard, and "Findings cannot be said to have been fairly reached unless material evidence which might impeach, as well as that which will support, its findings, is heard and weighed."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Golden Age Beverage Co.

    415 F.2d 26 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 95 times
    In NLRB v. Golden Age Beverage Company, 415 F.2d 26, 30 (5th Cir. 1969), this court apparently considered hearsay evidence at this stage of proceedings to set aside an election.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bata Shoe Co.

    377 F.2d 821 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 65 times
    In NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917, 88 S.Ct. 238, 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967), upon which Randall relies, the employer presented specific evidence of more severe procedural irregularities that demonstrably affected the election results.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Joclin Manufacturing Company

    314 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 50 times
    In NLRB v. Joclin Mfg. Co., 314 F.2d 627, 631-32 (2 Cir. 1963), we recognized that the Board's discretion in determining whether or not to hold a hearing was not unfettered, but we held that it could condition the right to a hearing on the existence of substantial and material issues: "[This] requirement [is] not only proper but necessary to prevent dilatory tactics by employers or unions disappointed in the election returns."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc.

    297 F.2d 74 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 50 times
    In NLRB v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc., (5 Cir. 1961) 297 F.2d 74, 76, the necessity for granting a hearing on objections to an election was under consideration.

  8. United States Rubber Company v. N.L.R.B

    373 F.2d 602 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 39 times

    No. 23208. February 20, 1967. Theo F. Weiss, San Antonio, Tex., Seymour Swerdlow, New York City, for petitioner, Clemens, Knight, Weiss Spencer, San Antonio, Tex., Arthur, Dry, Kalish, Taylor Wood, New York City, of counsel. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Laddon, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before WISDOM, COLEMAN and GODBOLD, Circuit

  9. Home Town Foods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    379 F.2d 241 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 31 times

    No. 23912. June 26, 1967. John Bacheller, Jr., Fisher Phillips, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert S. Hillman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before COLEMAN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges, and CARSWELL, District Judge. COLEMAN, Circuit Judge. Home Town Foods, Inc., seeks review of an NLRB order, asking that the order be set aside

  10. Lucas v. United States

    355 F.2d 245 (10th Cir. 1966)   Cited 28 times

    No. 8367. January 24, 1966. James F. Fellingham, Oklahoma City, Okla., for appellant. Benjamin E. Franklin, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Newell A. George, U.S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee. Before PICKETT, LEWIS and HILL, Circuit Judges. HILL, Circuit Judge. The appellant, Ernest Clifford Lucas, and his codefendant, Shirley Ann Haygood, who has not appealed, were convicted by a jury on all three counts of an information charging them with committing the offenses of the unlawful sale and transfer of heroin

  11. Section 159 - Representatives and elections

    29 U.S.C. § 159   Cited 2,441 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it