Leader Communications Incorporated

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"
  2. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Tomco Communications, Inc.

    567 F.2d 871 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 37 times
    Taking into consideration, in determining substantiality of evidence, that the Board diverged from the ALJ's findings on matters of credibility
  4. Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. N.L.R.B

    318 F.3d 1173 (10th Cir. 2003)   Cited 7 times
    Noting that demonstration of economic exigency justifies prompt implementation of a company's proposals
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Homer D. Bronson Co.

    273 F. App'x 32 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 1 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 07-2447-ag. April 10, 2008. Application of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of its Order, dated March 16, 2007, against Homer D. Bronson Company. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the application is GRANTED. Robert J. Englehart, Supervisory Attorney, Ruth E. Burdick, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, (Ronald Meisburg, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda

  6. Colorado-Ute Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    939 F.2d 1392 (10th Cir. 1991)   Cited 14 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Colorado-Ute, we held an employer may lawfully implement a management function clause upon reaching a valid impasse in bargaining.
  7. TNT USA Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    208 F.3d 362 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 99-4124(L), 99-4152(XAP). Argued: March 13, 2000. Decided: March 27, 2000. Petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board finding that petitioner bargained with intervenor in bad faith on August 27, 1993, and ordering petitioner (1) to reinstate its proposal for a collective-bargaining agreement as it stood prior to its withdrawal in bad faith; (2) to sign an agreement, if the reinstated proposal is accepted by intervenor; and (3) to give the agreement retroactive effect

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Suffield Academy

    322 F.3d 196 (2d Cir. 2003)   Cited 1 times

    No. 02-4049. Argued: January 16, 2003. Decided: February 28, 2003. Fred L. Cornell, Jr., Esq., Aileen A. Armstrong, Esq., Siobhan M. Kelly, Esq., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC. Peter B. Hoffman, Esq., National Labor Relations Board, Hartford, CT, for Petitioner-Appellant. Linda L. Morgan, Esq., Emanuel N. Psarakis, Esq., Robinson Cole, Hartford, CT, for Respondent-Appellee. Before: VAN GRAAFEILAND, KEARSE and B.D. PARKER, Jr., Circuit Judges. VAN GRAAFEILAND, Senior Circuit Judge

  9. Borden, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    19 F.3d 502 (10th Cir. 1994)   Cited 6 times
    Holding that there are no retroactivity concerns when an agency's ruling does not "overrule any controlling precedent upon which [petitioner] relied to its detriment"
  10. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Motors, Inc.

    603 F.2d 604 (7th Cir. 1979)   Cited 13 times

    No. 78-2340. Argued June 4, 1979. Decided July 16, 1979. This appeal was originally decided by unreported order on July 16, 1979. See Circuit Rule 35. The Court has subsequently decided to issue the decision as an opinion. Edward S. Dorsey, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Arthur D. Rutkowski, Evansville, Ind., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CASTLE, Senior Circuit Judge, CUMMINGS and BAUER, Circuit Judges. CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge. On