§

Le Marquis Hotel, LLC

340 N.L.R.B. 485 (N.L.R.B. 2003)
Le Marquis Hotel, LLC

12 Cited authorities

  1. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Savair Manufacturing Co.

    414 U.S. 270 (1973)   Cited 123 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that although an employee may not be "legally bound to vote for the union and has not promised to do so in any formal sense" some "would feel obliged " to cast a union vote after having signed a union recognition slip

  3. Linden Lumber Division, Summer & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    419 U.S. 301 (1974)   Cited 55 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "that while the election process has acknowledged superiority in ascertaining whether a union has majority support, [signed employee authorization] cards may adequately reflect employee sentiment"

  4. Alexander Dawson, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    586 F.2d 1300 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 40 times
    Holding "the content of a document, when considered with the circumstances surrounding its discovery, is an adequate basis for [its authentication]"

  5. Human Development Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    937 F.2d 657 (D.C. Cir. 1991)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 89-1551. Argued October 18, 1990. Decided July 9, 1991. Martin Gringer, Melville, N.Y., for petitioner. Jonathan Walters, Philadelphia, Pa., for intervenor. Scott D. MacDonald, Attorney, N.L.R.B., with whom Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Peter Winkler, Supervisory Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Marion L. Griffin also entered an appearance, Washington, D.C., for respondent. John Hogrogian and Michael Adler were on the brief, New

  6. American Bread Company v. N.L.R.B

    411 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 34 times
    In American Bread, it was physically possible for consumers to bring their own bread or go without, just as it was possible for Kroger shoppers to bring their own bags or go without.

  7. Pulley v. N.L.R.B

    395 F.2d 870 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 21 times
    Soliciting of an employee to engage in surveillance of union activities

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Southbridge Sheet Metal Works

    380 F.2d 851 (1st Cir. 1967)   Cited 16 times
    In NLRB v. Southbridge Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 380 F.2d 851 (1st Cir. 1967), the First Circuit considered this precise question.

  9. Retail Store Employees Un. L. 880 v. N.L.R.B

    419 F.2d 329 (D.C. Cir. 1969)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 21551, 21615. Argued November 4, 1968. Decided July 10, 1969. Mr. Joseph E. Finley, Cleveland, Ohio, with whom Mr. Melvin S. Schwarzwald, Cleveland, Ohio, was on the brief for petitioner in No. 21,551 and intervenor in No. 21,615. Mrs. Corinna Lothar Metcalf, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Gary Green, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, were on the

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Peter Paul, Inc.

    467 F.2d 700 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 6 times

    No. 71-1397. August 1, 1972. Rehearing Denied November 14, 1972. Charles Steele, Atty. (argued), William Wachter, Joseph E. Mayer, Attys., Dominic L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Atty. Gen., Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, NLRB, Region 20, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Robert J. Scolnik (argued), San Francisco, Cal., Marvin S. Siegel (argued), Menlo Park, Cal., Norman Leonard, San Francisco, Cal., Robert B. Snow, Jr.