§

Latino Express, Inc.

13-CA-122006 (N.L.R.B. Mar. 17, 2015)
Latino Express, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Litton Financial Printing Division v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    501 U.S. 190 (1991)   Cited 801 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a court must determine the validity of an arbitration agreement, it "cannot avoid that duty" just because the court must decide an issue on the merits

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    573 U.S. 513 (2014)   Cited 280 times   150 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  4. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  5. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  6. Magnesium Casting Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    401 U.S. 137 (1971)   Cited 74 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Approving that practice

  7. Cintas Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    482 F.3d 463 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 13 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding National Labor Relations Board determination that an employer's rule that was likely to chill employees' discussion of wages constituted an unfair labor practice under the NLRA

  8. Brockton Hosp. v. N.L.R.B

    294 F.3d 100 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 17 times
    In Brockton Hospital, the hospital employer maintained a confidentiality policy providing that "[i]nformation concerning patients, [nurses], or hospital operations should not be discussed..., except strictly in connection with hospital business."

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Southern Maryland Hosp. Center

    916 F.2d 932 (4th Cir. 1990)   Cited 17 times
    Noting that “the Board has on several occasions found that employers unreasonably chilled the exercise of their employees' Section 7 rights through excessive surveillance”

  10. Adair Standish Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    912 F.2d 854 (6th Cir. 1990)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that the employer violated the Act by instituting changes in the employees' schedules following the union's certification

  11. Section 157 - Right of employees as to organization, collective bargaining, etc.

    29 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 3,313 times   98 Legal Analyses
    Granting "employees" the right to unionize