§

Laredo Coca Cola Bottling Co.

258 N.L.R.B. 491 (N.L.R.B. 1981)
Laredo Coca Cola Bottling Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 323 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  2. N.L.R.B. v. W. C. McQuaide, Inc.

    552 F.2d 519 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 40 times
    In McQuaide, supra, we stated flatly: "Rather than focus on either the subjective intent of the striker or the perception of the `victim,' we adopt an objective standard to determine whether conduct constitutes a threat sufficiently egregious to justify" the imposition of sanctions by the employer.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.

    574 F.2d 835 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 38 times
    Striking employee swerved in front of and blocked another employee's car; second employee threw egg

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Laredo Coca Cola Bottling Co.

    613 F.2d 1338 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 19 times
    Finding that invitations to employees to disclose their union activities and sympathies constitute interrogation

  5. Mosher Steel Co. v. N.L.R.B

    568 F.2d 436 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 17 times
    Approving application of collateral estoppel to facts previously adjudicated in a labor dispute before an ALJ

  6. Associated Grocers of New England v. N.L.R.B

    562 F.2d 1333 (1st Cir. 1977)   Cited 17 times
    In Associated Grocers a striking employee made an obscene gesture to and hurled crude epithets at a supervising employee and strike-breaking accomplices.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thayer Co.

    213 F.2d 748 (1st Cir. 1954)   Cited 40 times
    In Thayer, the court first announced that if the activity causing dismissal was protected under § 7 of the Act then denial of reinstatement was unlawful. If the activity was unprotected under § 7, however, the legality of the denial was to be determined according to a balancing test.

  8. Dallas Gen. Drivers, Etc., v. N.L.R.B

    389 F.2d 553 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 20565, 20613. Argued June 14, 1967. Decided January 23, 1968. Mr. Fred O. Weldon, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Mr. David R. Richards, Dallas, Tex., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 20,565 and intervenor in No. 20,613. Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioner in No. 20,565. Mrs. Nancy M. Sherman, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, and Marcel