§

Laray A. Arrington, Complainant, v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs (Veterans Health Administration), Agency.

0120083143 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 27, 2012)
Laray A. Arrington, Complainant, v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs (Veterans Health Administration), Agency.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Montgomery Elevator v. Bldg. Engineering Servs

    730 F.2d 377 (5th Cir. 1984)   Cited 33 times
    Applying Louisiana law

  2. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 51,616 times   129 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions

  3. Section 794 - Nondiscrimination under Federal grants and programs

    29 U.S.C. § 794   Cited 12,365 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Adopting ADA standards for Rehabilitation Act claims

  4. Section 791 - Employment of individuals with disabilities

    29 U.S.C. § 791   Cited 2,274 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Adopting standards for ADA claims under § 501 of the Rehabilitation Act, including 42 U.S.C. § 12112, which forbids discrimination "against a qualified individual with a disability because of the disability . . ."

  5. Section 1614.504 - Compliance with settlement agreements and final action

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.504   Cited 189 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that if an employee believes an agency has failed to comply with a settlement agreement, the employee must notify the EEO Director of noncompliance and, notably, may request that the terms of the agreement be implemented or that the prior EEO complaint be reinstated for further processing from the point in time that processing ceased

  6. Section 1614.402 - Time for appeals to the Commission

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.402   Cited 114 times
    Setting forth thirty-day period in which Title VII complainant may appeal agency's final decision

  7. Section 1614.405 - Decisions on appeals

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.405   Cited 81 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that " decision [of the EEOC in an administrative appeal] is final . . . unless . . . [e]ither party files a timely request for reconsideration"