§

Langlade Veneer Products Corp.

118 N.L.R.B. 985 (N.L.R.B. 1957)
Langlade Veneer Products Corp.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Crompton Mills

    337 U.S. 217 (1949)   Cited 102 times
    Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

  2. Labor Board v. Highland Park Co.

    341 U.S. 322 (1951)   Cited 63 times
    In Highland it was claimed that the term "national or international labor organization" as used in the National Labor Relations Act is a technical one, meaning "union", thereby excluding the CIO, which was "a federation".

  3. Labor Board v. Coca-Cola Bot. Co.

    350 U.S. 264 (1956)   Cited 50 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Louisville, 1956, 350 U.S. 264, 76 S.Ct. 383, 384, 100 L.Ed. 285, the Supreme Court rejected the attempted distinction as "too thin a dialectic enterprise".

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bradley Washfountain

    192 F.2d 144 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 55 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Bradley Washfountain Co., 7 Cir., 192 F.2d 144, 152, 153, we explicitly stated: "The cases involving the propriety of an employer's solicitation of individual employees, seem to fall into at least three classes.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C. J. Camp, Inc.

    216 F.2d 113 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 15 times

    No. 15064. October 29, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel N.L.R.B., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel N.L.R.B., Ruth V. Reel, Arnold Ordman, Attorneys N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. E. Snow Martin, Lakeland, Fla., William F. Howe, Jerome Powell, Washington, D.C., Bryant Martin, Lakeland, Fla., Gall Lane Howe, Washington, D.C., Gall, Lane and Howe, Washington, D.C., for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RIVES and TUTTLE, Circuit

  6. National Lab. R. Bd. v. E. Mass. St. Ry. Co.

    235 F.2d 700 (1st Cir. 1956)   Cited 10 times
    Noting the development by the Board of a section 10(c) "for cause" body of case law

  7. Goodman Mfg. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    234 F.2d 775 (7th Cir. 1956)   Cited 5 times

    No. 11403. June 15, 1956. Edward S. Stern, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. David B. Rothstein, Chicago, Ill., for intervenor. David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before MAJOR, LINDLEY and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. MAJOR, Circuit Judge. This is a petition to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board (respondent), entered January 28, 1955, against Goodman Manufacturing Company of Chicago

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Puerto Rico Food Prod

    232 F.2d 515 (1st Cir. 1956)   Cited 4 times

    No. 4984. April 26, 1956. Rehearing Denied June 13, 1956. George L. Weasler, Field Atty., N.L.R.B., San Juan, P.R., with whom Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel and William J. Avrutis, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner. Jaime Pieras, Jr., San Juan, P.R., for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and BIGGS and WOODBURY, Circuit Judges. WOODBURY, Circuit