§

Lamar Advertising of Hartford

343 N.L.R.B. 261 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
Lamar Advertising of Hartford

10 Cited authorities

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Tr. Co.

    339 U.S. 306 (1950)   Cited 10,573 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that due process requires a hearing "appropriate to the nature of the case"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Martin

    954 F.2d 353 (6th Cir. 1992)   Cited 61 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that former version of statute protected employees who complain about “possible safety violations”

  4. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"

  5. Rodale Press, Inc. v. F.T.C

    407 F.2d 1252 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 44 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Rodale, we overturned the Board for grounding liability in the theory that the advertising in issue misrepresented the contents of the book where petitioner's theory was that the misleading advertisements repeated misleading health tips given in the book.

  6. Henry Bierce Co. v. N.L.R.B

    23 F.3d 1101 (6th Cir. 1994)   Cited 6 times
    Polling employees without informing union about poll is direct dealing

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Johnnie's Poultry Co.

    344 F.2d 617 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 32 times   11 Legal Analyses
    In N.L.R.B. v. Johnnie's Poultry Co., 8 Cir., 344 F.2d 617, we recognized that an employer has no vested right to insist that union representation be established by a Board conducted election but we further held that an employer acting in good faith belief that a union lacked majority representation was not required to recognize and bargain with the union until such doubt was resolved.

  8. National Surface Cleaning, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    54 F.3d 35 (1st Cir. 1995)

    No. 94-2048. Heard April 7, 1995. Decided May 15, 1995. Nathan L. Kaitz with whom Morgan, Brown Joy was on brief for petitioner. Richard Cohen with whom Frederick Havard, Supervisory Atty., Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Acting Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and N.L.R.B. were on brief for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CYR, Circuit Judge, ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge, and BOUDIN

  9. Bendix Corporation v. F.T.C

    450 F.2d 534 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 16 times
    In Bendix, this Court vacated the FTC's decision and remanded because the Commission "decided the case on a theory of illegality which was never charged, raised, nor tried during the administrative hearing; never presented for consideration by the Hearing Examiner; and not raised as an issue or discussed in the appeal," id. at 537, thus denying Bendix "notice... [and an] opportunity to present evidence in defense."

  10. Section 554 - Adjudications

    5 U.S.C. § 554   Cited 1,050 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to agencies to "issue a declaratory order to terminate a controversy or remove uncertainty."